@aahoughton/oav-core
v1.1.2
Published
HTTP-aware OpenAPI request/response validator with a JSON Schema codegen compiler. Zero runtime dependencies; install @aahoughton/oav for the batteries-included experience (YAML readers + CLI).
Downloads
574
Maintainers
Readme
oav
OpenAPI 3.0 / 3.1 / 3.2 HTTP request and response validator. Two primary drivers:
- Tenant overrides over a base spec. When tenants extend a
shared API — adding a required header on one route, refining a
schema, requiring auth where the base spec didn't — they need to
document those changes in the spec they ship, not as
application-side patches.
applyOverlaysrewrites the document at load time. Custom keywords, formats, and dialects plug into the compiler the same way, so per-tenant validation rules don't require forking. See OVERLAYS.md. - Validators that fit in microservice runners.
oav compile-spec openapi.yamlemits a single zero-dependency ES module exposing the full validator surface. Targets Cloudflare Workers, Vercel Edge, Lambda@Edge, Deno Deploy — runtimes wherenew Function()is unavailable, or where dependency footprint matters.--only "POST /pets"(repeatable) scopes the output to specific operations without touching the source spec.
Errors come back as a typed tree (code, path, message,
params, children). One validator call covers the full HTTP
frame: method, path, parameters, body, content type, status, and
headers.
Install
oav ships in two core packages, plus framework adapter packages that
build on either oav or oav-core -- if you don't need YAML support,
you can skip oav entirely — the lean path for zero-dependency / edge
targets:
| Package | When to use |
| -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
| oav | Batteries-included: YAML readers + the oav CLI. Depends on yaml; pulls in commander + esbuild for the CLI only (never imported from the library entry points, so bundlers tree-shake them out of application bundles; Node server runs load them only when the oav binary is invoked). |
| oav-core | Lean. Zero runtime dependencies. Same programmatic surface as oav, minus the YAML readers and CLI. Feed it JSON specs (or pre-parsed objects via the memory reader). |
| oav-express4 | Express 4 framework adapter. Thin: imports the validator from oav-core, exports a middleware factory plus standalone helpers. See INTEGRATION.md. |
| oav-express5 | Express 5 framework adapter. Same exports as oav-express4; promise-native middleware shape. |
| oav-fastify | Fastify framework adapter. Same exports as the Express adapters; ships a preValidation hook instead of middleware. |
npm install @aahoughton/oav # YAML + CLI
npm install @aahoughton/oav-core # JSON only, zero runtime deps
npm install @aahoughton/oav-express4 # Express 4 adapter (transitively pulls oav-core)
npm install @aahoughton/oav-express5 # Express 5 adapter
npm install @aahoughton/oav-fastify # Fastify adapteroav re-exports oav-core at matching
subpaths. Samples below use oav; on the lean package,
substitute oav-core in imports that don't touch the
YAML readers (createYamlFileReader, createSmartHttpReader) or
the CLI.
The commander + esbuild deps oav pulls in are
reachable only from the oav CLI binary (dist/cli.js). Application
code importing from oav hits dist/index.js, which
doesn't reference them — bundlers tree-shake them out of the output,
and Node servers load them only when the CLI is invoked. Consumers
who want to skip the ~10 MB of esbuild's native binary on disk can
install oav-core instead (zero runtime deps, no CLI).
Quick start
import { createValidator, createYamlFileReader, formatText } from "@aahoughton/oav";
import { loadSpec } from "@aahoughton/oav/spec";
const { document } = await loadSpec({
reader: createYamlFileReader(),
entry: "openapi.yaml",
});
const validator = createValidator(document);
const err = validator.validateRequest({
method: "POST",
path: "/pets",
contentType: "application/json",
headers: { "x-tenant": "acme" },
body: { name: "Fido" },
});
if (err !== null) console.error(formatText(err));For a multi-file spec or a spec hosted over HTTP, compose readers:
composeReaders([createYamlFileReader(), createSmartHttpReader(), createFileReader()])
handles local YAML, remote JSON / YAML, and local JSON transparently.
validateRequest / validateResponse return null on success or a
ValidationError tree on failure. Every error carries a stable code
(e.g. "type", "required", "content-type", "oneOf"), a path
rooted at the HTTP frame (e.g. ["body", "pets", 3, "name"]), a
human-readable message, and a machine-readable params object whose
shape per code is documented in BuiltInErrorParams.
How it compares
oav's primary alternative is
Ajv — directly for
compileSchema, or via
express-openapi-validator
for HTTP validation. (Migrating from EOV specifically:
MIGRATION-FROM-EOV.md.)
Numbers below are from the performance/
benchmark on AWS c7i.large (Intel Sapphire Rapids, Node 22). Your
hardware will vary.
Compile: oav is meaningfully faster.
| | Ajv | oav | | ------------------------------------------ | ----- | --------- | | Single synthetic schema (varies by shape) | ~6 ms | 25–200 µs | | Real-world spec (petstore-31, ~10 schemas) | 27 ms | 1.6 ms |
Ajv compile is essentially constant overhead per schema; oav scales with shape. The advantage shows up wherever validator construction sits in the hot path — per-request, per-tenant, per-test, edge cold-start, AOT module emit.
Validate: roughly tied on simple shapes; Ajv wins on complex.
Both libraries are sub-microsecond per check on typical OpenAPI
bodies. On complex oneOf/allOf or large arrays, Ajv leads by
2–4× (say 100 ns → 400 ns per call, or 1.7 µs → 4 µs). oav's
predicate mode (compileSchema(..., { predicate: true })) closes
most of that gap for yes/no use cases.
For typical HTTP workloads — 1k–10k req/sec × ~1 validation per request — the difference is invisible at any of those numbers. For validation-heavy code (millions of validations per second), Ajv wins.
Full per-shape breakdown: COMPARISON.md. Raw
benchmark data and methodology:
performance/README.md.
Conformance
The conformance/ sub-package drives the
compiler and CLI against the upstream JSON Schema 2020-12 Test Suite,
a set of OpenAPI 3.0 / 3.1 / 3.2 petstore scenarios, and a handful of
real-world specs (Stripe, GitHub, DigitalOcean, Twilio, Asana, Box,
Adyen) that have to load and compile without error. See
conformance/REPORT.md for pass / fail
counts by category.
Categories oav does not aim to cover:
$dynamicRefwith runtime dynamic-scope rebinding. oav resolves statically against the anchor map.- The
optional/format/*subtree. Those tests target strict-assertion behaviour;formatis annotation-only by default per JSON Schema 2020-12 §6.3. - A small tail of isolated optional cases (float-overflow handling, external-ref loading tied to the dynamic-scope category above).
In practice, OpenAPI specs generated or hand-authored by application
developers rarely touch any of these. $dynamicRef / $dynamicAnchor
are concentrated in meta-schemas and extensible-type libraries (JSON
Schema's own meta-schema, Hyperjump's type system); a spec that
describes "POST /pets takes a Pet" doesn't declare them. The strict
format-assertion gap only surfaces if you rely on RFC-edge behaviour
in iri / iri-reference or non-BMP regex content — date-time,
email, uuid, and the common URI formats pass. Float overflow
concerns numbers beyond Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER (~9 × 10¹⁵);
outside that range, JavaScript's own Number precision is the
limiting factor regardless of validator. If any of these corners
matter for your use case, the report lays out which tests fail and
why.
CLI
oav resolve openapi.yaml
oav validate openapi.yaml --request req.http
oav validate openapi.yaml --path "POST /pets" --body payload.json
oav validate openapi.yaml --path "GET /pets" --response --status 200 --body resp.json
oav compile-schema schema.json -o validator.mjs # JSON Schema → standalone validator
oav compile-spec openapi.yaml -o validator.mjs # OpenAPI → standalone HTTP validator (edge / Lambda)Flags: --format text|json|flat, --depth n, --overlay file
(repeatable), -o file, --quiet, --dialect (compile-schema /
compile-spec), --requests-only (compile-spec), --only METHOD PATH
(compile-spec, repeatable). See
packages/cli/README.md for the full
surface, the .http file format, and both compile commands' output
contracts.
compile-schema and compile-spec emit ES modules with zero imports
after the esbuild bundle step. compile-spec's output exposes the
same validateRequest / validateResponse / getOperation surface
as createValidator(document) but with every schema already compiled
into the file — suited for Cloudflare Workers / Vercel Edge /
Lambda@Edge where runtime ajv.compile() is forbidden, or for
Lambda cold-start latency where skipping 10–50 ms of spec parse +
compile pays back.
Versions
createValidator reads the spec's openapi string once at construction
and picks the matching dialect. No per-request branching.
| Spec | Dialect | Notes |
| ----- | --------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------- |
| 3.0.x | OAS 3.0 Schema Object | nullable, boolean exclusiveMin/Max, sibling-$ref drop |
| 3.1.x | JSON Schema 2020-12 | Assertive format |
| 3.2.x | JSON Schema 2020-12 | Same as 3.1 + the QUERY HTTP method |
Override via createValidator(spec, { dialect }) to force or customise
one of the built-in dialects (jsonSchemaDialect, openapi31Dialect,
oas30Dialect). Unknown / missing openapi strings fall back to the
3.1 dialect by default; configure with
onUnknownVersion: "throw" | "warn" | "fallback31".
Swagger 2.0 specs aren't supported directly — createValidator
throws on swagger: "2.0" documents. Convert to OpenAPI 3.0 first with
swagger2openapi
and pass the 3.0 output to createValidator:
npx swagger2openapi swagger.json -o openapi.jsonConfiguring the validator
| Option | Effect |
| ----------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| dialect | Force a specific schema dialect, bypassing version detection. |
| formats | Extra string format validators merged on top of the built-ins. |
| keywords | Register user-defined schema keywords (see below). |
| maxErrors | Cap on leaf errors; 1 is fast-fail, default is uncapped. |
| strictQueryParameters | Reject undeclared query parameters. Default false. |
| validateSecurity | Shape-only security check (bearer / basic / apiKey). Default false (auth middleware runs upstream); set true to opt in. |
| ignoreUndocumented | Return null on requests whose path the router can't match. Default false. |
| ignorePaths | Predicate (path) => boolean; returning true short-circuits validation to null before routing. |
| onUnknownVersion | Policy for specs with missing/unsupported openapi: "fallback31" (default), "warn", or "throw". |
Custom keywords
const validator = createValidator(spec, {
keywords: {
activeTenant: (data) =>
typeof data !== "string" || tenantCache.has(data)
? true
: { message: `tenant "${data}" is not active` },
},
});Custom keywords plug into generated code alongside the built-ins. See examples/custom-keywords.ts.
Bounded error collection
createValidator(spec, { maxErrors: 1 }); // fast-fail
createValidator(spec, { maxErrors: 10 }); // bound CPU/memory on huge payloadsHot loops (array items, object properties, allOf/anyOf branches)
short-circuit once the budget is exhausted. Results carry
truncated: true so callers know the tree was capped.
Framework integration
oav is a validator, not a middleware package: you write a short
adapter between your framework and validateRequest /
validateResponse. An Express 5 adapter is about this long:
import { allowHeaderFor, httpStatusFor, toProblemDetails } from "@aahoughton/oav";
app.use(async (req, res, next) => {
const err = validator.validateRequest({
method: req.method,
path: req.path,
query: req.query as Record<string, string | string[]>,
headers: req.headers as Record<string, string | string[]>,
contentType: req.get("content-type") ?? undefined,
body: req.body,
});
if (err === null) return next();
const allow = allowHeaderFor(err);
if (allow !== undefined) res.setHeader("Allow", allow);
res
.status(httpStatusFor(err))
.type("application/problem+json")
.json(toProblemDetails(err, { instance: req.originalUrl }));
});See INTEGRATION.md for:
- Adapter packages for Express 4, Express 5, and Fastify; recipes for Next.js, Hono, Bun, and Deno via the Web Standards adapter.
- Recipes for file uploads (multer), response validation, security, ignoring paths, and the full status-code switch.
- A migration table from
express-openapi-validator, including where oav is stricter or more conformant and where you'll do more wiring by hand.
Companion adapter packages cover the common framework wiring:
oav-express4,
oav-express5,
oav-fastify. They
share the same export names and option shapes; only the
framework-typed argument differs.
oav is not a drop-in for express-openapi-validator: the
adapters cover the request-validation middleware, but you own the
error → HTTP mapping if you customise it, you wire up multer if you
need file uploads, and you run your own auth middleware. The error
tree is structured (code/path/message/params/children),
the OpenAPI 3.0 dialect is built in rather than translated to
2020-12, and the validator does not mutate req or res.
Modules
The package publishes a small root and four subpath entrypoints.
oav-core exposes the same five entrypoints; substitute
oav-core/... to import from the lean package.
| Import | Surface |
| ------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------- |
| @aahoughton/oav | createValidator, error helpers, formatters, types |
| @aahoughton/oav/schema | compileSchema, dialects, vocabularies, custom keywords |
| @aahoughton/oav/spec | loadSpec, resolveSpec, applyOverlays, readers |
| @aahoughton/oav/formats | Built-in string format validators |
| @aahoughton/oav/core | Error tree model, shared OpenAPI / HTTP types |
oav also exports createYamlFileReader,
createSmartHttpReader (HTTP reader that handles both JSON and YAML
by inspecting Content-Type), and parseYamlString at the root entry,
and ships the oav CLI as a bin.
Examples
Runnable, self-contained TypeScript examples in
examples/:
| File | Shows |
| ------------------------------ | -------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| basic-validation.ts | Load a spec → createValidator → request and response checks |
| custom-formats.ts | Register a user string format (E.164 phone) |
| custom-keywords.ts | Register a schema keyword that reads dynamic runtime state |
| cross-field-validation.ts | Cross-field constraint (max >= min) via an object-level keyword |
| max-errors.ts | Fast-fail and bounded error collection on a bulk-invalid payload |
| versions.ts | 3.0, 3.1, 3.2 side by side (nullable, QUERY method) |
| overlay.ts | Merge a gateway header requirement into one operation |
| overlay-petstore-schema.ts | Extend the Pet component with a deployment-required field |
| overlay-petstore-endpoint.ts | Require an X-Tenant header on POST /pets via an endpoint overlay |
| spec-digest.ts | Derive middleware config (multer limits, required headers) at boot |
Known limitations
Runtime-behaviour corners. For a feature-scope comparison against
Ajv (draft versions, $data, async validation, etc.) see
COMPARISON.md.
$dynamicRefbehaves like$refwith anchor lookup — no runtime dynamic-scope traversal.style: deepObjectquery parameters support only single-level nesting (obj[key]=value). OpenAPI 3.0–3.2 do not define nested semantics; specs that rely onobj[a][b]=valueshould model the flattened shape explicitly or use a different parameter style.patternkeywords andformat: "regex"compile to the JavaScript built-inRegExp, which has no execution timeout. If your OpenAPI spec is attacker-controlled (e.g. multi-tenant upload), a catastrophic pattern like(a+)+$is a ReDoS vector against any string the validator checks. Vet spec sources before loading them. A pluggableregexCompileroption for plugging inre2or a complexity-checking engine is tracked in #146.
Contributing
See CONTRIBUTING.md for branch / PR / release flow. Development workflow (lint / typecheck / test / build) and the conformance and performance sub-packages are described there and in CLAUDE.md.
License
MIT — see LICENSE.
