npm package discovery and stats viewer.

Discover Tips

  • General search

    [free text search, go nuts!]

  • Package details

    pkg:[package-name]

  • User packages

    @[username]

Sponsor

Optimize Toolset

I’ve always been into building performant and accessible sites, but lately I’ve been taking it extremely seriously. So much so that I’ve been building a tool to help me optimize and monitor the sites that I build to make sure that I’m making an attempt to offer the best experience to those who visit them. If you’re into performant, accessible and SEO friendly sites, you might like it too! You can check it out at Optimize Toolset.

About

Hi, 👋, I’m Ryan Hefner  and I built this site for me, and you! The goal of this site was to provide an easy way for me to check the stats on my npm packages, both for prioritizing issues and updates, and to give me a little kick in the pants to keep up on stuff.

As I was building it, I realized that I was actually using the tool to build the tool, and figured I might as well put this out there and hopefully others will find it to be a fast and useful way to search and browse npm packages as I have.

If you’re interested in other things I’m working on, follow me on Twitter or check out the open source projects I’ve been publishing on GitHub.

I am also working on a Twitter bot for this site to tweet the most popular, newest, random packages from npm. Please follow that account now and it will start sending out packages soon–ish.

Open Software & Tools

This site wouldn’t be possible without the immense generosity and tireless efforts from the people who make contributions to the world and share their work via open source initiatives. Thank you 🙏

© 2026 – Pkg Stats / Ryan Hefner

@composurecdk/cloudformation

v0.9.5

Published

Composable CloudFormation stack builder and stack assignment strategies

Readme

@composurecdk/cloudformation

CloudFormation builders for ComposureCDK.

This package provides a fluent builder for CloudFormation Stacks, convenience stack strategies, and a post-build hook for creating CloudFormation outputs from composed systems.

Stack Builder

import { createStackBuilder } from "@composurecdk/cloudformation";

const { stack } = createStackBuilder()
  .description("Network infrastructure")
  .terminationProtection(true)
  .build(app, "NetworkStack");

Every StackProps property is available as a fluent setter on the builder.

Tags

Add tags that propagate to all resources within the stack:

const { stack } = createStackBuilder()
  .tag("team", "platform")
  .tag("environment", "production")
  .build(app, "ServiceStack");

Variants and snapshots with .copy()

.copy() returns an independent builder with the same configured state. Use it to derive variants from a shared base, or to snapshot a builder before handing it to a stack strategy that may be invoked after further mutations:

const baseStack = createStackBuilder().tag("team", "platform");

const { stack: us } = baseStack.copy().description("US region").build(app, "UsStack");
const { stack: eu } = baseStack.copy().description("EU region").build(app, "EuStack");

Stack Strategies

Convenience wrappers around @composurecdk/core's strategy primitives. Both accept a Lifecycle<StackBuilderResult> (typically an IStackBuilder) and default to a fresh createStackBuilder() per call.

singleStack

Places all components in a single auto-created Stack:

import { singleStack } from "@composurecdk/cloudformation";

compose({ handler, api }, { handler: [], api: ["handler"] })
  .withStackStrategy(singleStack())
  .build(app, "MySystem");

Pass a configured builder to apply tags, description, etc. to the strategy's stack. Use .copy() to snapshot the configuration when the original may be mutated later:

const base = createStackBuilder().tag("team", "platform");

compose({ ... }, { ... })
  .withStackStrategy(singleStack(base.copy()))
  .build(app, "MySystem");

groupedStacks

Groups components into named Stacks by a classifier function:

import { groupedStacks } from "@composurecdk/cloudformation";

compose({ handler, api, table }, { ... })
  .withStackStrategy(
    groupedStacks((key) => (key === "table" ? "persistence" : "service")),
  )
  .build(app, "MySystem");

The same builder is invoked once per group key with ${systemId}-${group} as the id, so any tags configured on the supplied builder propagate to every stack the strategy creates. As with singleStack, pass builder.copy() to snapshot the configuration when the original may be mutated after hand-off:

const base = createStackBuilder().tag("team", "platform");

compose({ ... }, { ... })
  .withStackStrategy(
    groupedStacks((key) => (key === "table" ? "persistence" : "service"), base.copy()),
  )
  .build(app, "MySystem");

outputs

A post-build hook that creates CloudFormation stack outputs from a composed system's build results. Output values can be concrete strings or Refs that resolve against the system's results.

import { compose, ref } from "@composurecdk/core";
import { outputs } from "@composurecdk/cloudformation";

compose(
  { site: createBucketBuilder(), cdn: createDistributionBuilder() },
  { site: [], cdn: ["site"] },
)
  .afterBuild(
    outputs({
      DistributionUrl: {
        value: ref("cdn", (r) => `https://${r.distribution.distributionDomainName}`),
        description: "CloudFront distribution URL",
      },
      BucketName: {
        value: ref("site", (r) => r.bucket.bucketName),
        description: "S3 bucket name for site content",
      },
    }),
  )
  .build(stack, "StaticWebsite");

templateTextPolicy

CloudFormation stores template text as ASCII. An em-dash, a curly quote or an ellipsis is silently transliterated to ? at deploy time — no error, no CREATE_FAILED. The deployed template simply stops matching the synthesised one, so cdk diff reports a change on every run afterwards, forever, on a stack nobody touched. The only way out is to notice the character and strip it by hand.

templateTextPolicy is a Policy that finds those characters at synth time instead.

import { templateTextPolicy } from "@composurecdk/cloudformation";

templateTextPolicy(app); // fail synth on anything CloudFormation would rewrite

Modes

| onViolation | Behaviour | Use it when | | --------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------- | | "throw" (default) | Fails synth, naming the construct path, the field and the offending character. | You want the text fixed at the source. | | "sanitize" | Rewrites the value so the synthesised template matches what CloudFormation stores. Nothing fails. | A large existing estate you cannot chase string by string. | | "warn" | Annotates every violation and carries on. | Adoption: run it, fix the list, then switch to "throw". |

sanitize replaces per character, not per run — “value” becomes "value", not a single -. Common typographic characters map to readable ASCII; anything else becomes ?, which is what CloudFormation would have stored anyway. Override with replace:

templateTextPolicy(app, {
  onViolation: "sanitize",
  replace: (char) => (char === "€" ? "EUR" : transliterate(char)),
});

Why it is opt-in

Enforcing this inside every builder would turn a working — if diff-noisy — deployment into a synth failure for anyone who has been living with the transliteration. Installing the policy is how you say you would rather know. Constraints whose violation fails the deploy rather than merely the diff, such as an EC2 GroupDescription, stay enforced at the builder regardless (ADR-0010).

An Aspect also reaches further than a builder can. A per-builder validator only covers fields someone remembered to wire one into — which is exactly how the stack-level Description slipped through, since StackBuilder passes description straight to StackProps. The Aspect walks the whole construct tree, so for the resource types it knows about it also catches constructs this library never built: raw L1s and other libraries' L2s alike.

What it checks

The stack's own Description, every CfnOutput / CfnParameter description, and these resource properties:

| Resource type | Property | | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------ | | AWS::CloudWatch::Alarm, AWS::CloudWatch::CompositeAlarm | alarmDescription | | AWS::Lambda::Function, AWS::Events::Rule, AWS::IAM::Role, AWS::IAM::ManagedPolicy | description | | AWS::ApiGateway::RestApi, Stage, Deployment, UsagePlan, ApiKey | description | | AWS::Neptune::DBClusterParameterGroup, AWS::Neptune::DBParameterGroup | description | | AWS::EC2::SecurityGroup | groupDescription | | AWS::SNS::Topic | displayName |

That is a seed list, not the whole of CloudFormation — several hundred resource types declare a free-text property. Add the ones you use:

templateTextPolicy(app, { fields: { "AWS::Custom::Widget": ["notes"] } });

Keys are CloudFormation resource types; values are CDK L1 property names (camelCase — alarmDescription, not AlarmDescription).

What it does not cover

  • Values that resolve to a CloudFormation intrinsic (Ref, Fn::ImportValue) — the text is not knowable at synth. A Lazy that resolves to a plain string is checked.
  • Values written through addPropertyOverride, or set on a bare CfnResource's properties. Both bypass the typed L1 accessor the policy reads.
  • Nested properties such as DistributionConfig.Comment.
  • Resource types and properties not in the table above, until you add them. A property name that does not match an L1 accessor is skipped silently — the same outcome as not listing it.

To check a single value directly rather than a whole tree, use constraints.validate.templateText / constraints.sanitize.templateText (catalogue).

Examples