npm package discovery and stats viewer.

Discover Tips

  • General search

    [free text search, go nuts!]

  • Package details

    pkg:[package-name]

  • User packages

    @[username]

Sponsor

Optimize Toolset

I’ve always been into building performant and accessible sites, but lately I’ve been taking it extremely seriously. So much so that I’ve been building a tool to help me optimize and monitor the sites that I build to make sure that I’m making an attempt to offer the best experience to those who visit them. If you’re into performant, accessible and SEO friendly sites, you might like it too! You can check it out at Optimize Toolset.

About

Hi, 👋, I’m Ryan Hefner  and I built this site for me, and you! The goal of this site was to provide an easy way for me to check the stats on my npm packages, both for prioritizing issues and updates, and to give me a little kick in the pants to keep up on stuff.

As I was building it, I realized that I was actually using the tool to build the tool, and figured I might as well put this out there and hopefully others will find it to be a fast and useful way to search and browse npm packages as I have.

If you’re interested in other things I’m working on, follow me on Twitter or check out the open source projects I’ve been publishing on GitHub.

I am also working on a Twitter bot for this site to tweet the most popular, newest, random packages from npm. Please follow that account now and it will start sending out packages soon–ish.

Open Software & Tools

This site wouldn’t be possible without the immense generosity and tireless efforts from the people who make contributions to the world and share their work via open source initiatives. Thank you 🙏

© 2026 – Pkg Stats / Ryan Hefner

@connectrpc-tauri/transport

v0.1.2

Published

ConnectRPC transport over Tauri IPC (commands + channels)

Readme

ConnectRPC over Tauri IPC

A ConnectRPC transport that carries the Connect protocol over Tauri's IPC instead of HTTP. The webview is the client, Rust hosts the services, and no HTTP server or port is involved.

All four method kinds work: unary, server streaming, client streaming, and bidi.

Why this works without reimplementing Connect

Both sides already expose a byte-level seam, so this crate is only a shuttle between them:

  • Rust's ConnectRpcService is a tower::Service<http::Request> returning http::Response, so it accepts a synthetic request that never touched a socket.
  • TypeScript's @connectrpc/connect/protocol-connect exports createTransport, which takes an httpClient: UniversalClientFn — a plain (request) => Promise<response> over async-iterable bodies.

Message serialization, envelope framing, compression negotiation, trailers, error mapping, and Connect's idempotent-GET support all come from the existing runtimes.

This wraps the protocol-level createTransport, not connect-web's createConnectTransport. That distinction is what makes client-streaming and bidi work: the web transport rejects them because the fetch API cannot stream a request body, and there is no fetch here to be limited by.

Usage

Rust:

let router = Arc::new(Greeter).register(connectrpc::Router::new());

tauri::Builder::default()
    .plugin(connectrpc_tauri::serve(ConnectRpcService::new(router)))
    .run(tauri::generate_context!())
    .expect("failed to run app");

TypeScript:

import { createClient } from "@connectrpc/connect";
import { createTauriTransport } from "@connectrpc-tauri/transport";

const client = createClient(GreetService, createTauriTransport());
const { greeting } = await client.greet({ name: "World" });

The capability file must grant the plugin's permission, or every call fails with Plugin not found:

{
  "identifier": "default",
  "windows": ["main"],
  "permissions": ["core:default", "connectrpc-tauri:default"]
}

The permission prefix is the Rust crate name. Tauri's ACL keys a plugin's permissions on CARGO_PKG_NAME, so PLUGIN_NAME must equal the crate name; a mismatch is rejected at the ACL layer before any command runs.

How it maps onto IPC

Unary calls bypass Tauri's IPC entirely. Everything else uses three commands and one channel per call:

| Connect concept | Tauri mechanism | | ----------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------- | | Unary request and response | fetch("ipc-connect://…"), a custom URI scheme | | Request head + first body chunk | invoke("connect_rpc", …) with a protobuf ArrayBuffer | | Response head (status + headers) | Resolved value of that invoke | | Streaming response body frames | Channel<InvokeResponseBody> carrying raw protobuf | | Client-stream / bidi request frames | invoke("connect_rpc_send", …) | | Cancellation | invoke("connect_rpc_cancel", …), from AbortSignal | | Trailers | In-band, via Connect's own EndStreamResponse envelope |

The envelopes are protobuf because Tauri's IPC payload is either raw bytes or JSON, never both, and a JSON payload encodes bytes as one number per byte. Protobuf keeps every frame a single raw buffer, so Connect's bytes stay binary end to end. For the same reason the response channel id travels inside StartRequest rather than as a JSON command argument.

Channels are used rather than events: Tauri's event system is broadcast and unordered relative to a call, so it would need correlation ids and dedup that a channel provides for free.

Streaming and backpressure

Streaming is incremental in both directions, not buffered. The request body is an mpsc-backed http_body::Body that connect_rpc_send feeds, so a webview writing faster than the handler reads is held at CHANNEL_DEPTH chunks — the pending invoke is the backpressure signal.

On the webview side that signal is a send in flight. Messages produced while one is outstanding are coalesced into the next send rather than each taking a round trip, and a producer that outruns the hop by more than MAX_PENDING_BYTES waits for it instead of buffering the stream.

Everything on the IPC path is async: all three commands are async fn, the service is driven on its own task so the response head can return before the body completes, and the response pump yields via the cooperative-scheduling budget so an in-memory stream cannot monopolise a worker or outrun a cancel. The one synchronous lock guards a hash map and is never held across an await, which #![deny(clippy::await_holding_lock)] enforces.

Layout

crates/connectrpc-tauri      Rust plugin
packages/transport           @connectrpc-tauri/transport
examples/greet-app           demo app exercising all four kinds
proto/                       transport envelopes + demo service

Verifying

cargo test -p connectrpc-tauri     # 12 tests over the real Connect runtime
npx vitest run                     # transport unit tests

# End-to-end, in a real webview. Exits nonzero on failure.
npm run build --workspace @connectrpc-tauri/transport
npm run build --workspace greet-app
GREET_APP_SELFTEST=1 cargo run --release -p greet-app --features custom-protocol

The first two stub the IPC bridge on their own side. The third is the one that proves Tauri's real commands and channels carry the protocol: it runs all four method kinds plus a mid-stream cancel in a real webview, asserts the greetings each RPC returned, prints a transcript, and exits with a status.

Benchmarking

npm run build --workspace @connectrpc-tauri/transport
npm run build --workspace greet-app
GREET_APP_BENCH=1 cargo run --release -p greet-app --features custom-protocol

This times the transport against the floor of what Tauri IPC can do for the same bytes: a raw invoke carrying protobuf, a raw invoke with Tauri's default JSON arguments, a bare Channel for streamed responses, and one invoke per message for streamed requests. It runs inside the webview because that is where the cost is — the expensive part of Tauri IPC is crossing the webview boundary, which a Rust-only benchmark never pays.

Times are batched rather than measured per call: WebKit clamps performance.now() to 1ms, which is coarser than an entire RPC.

On an M-series mac, release build:

| Case | This transport | Best raw baseline | | ----------------------------- | -------------- | ----------------- | | unary, 16-byte request | 0.203ms | 0.195ms (1.04x) | | unary, 4KiB request | 0.227ms | 0.223ms (1.02x) | | unary, 64KiB request | 0.363ms | 0.340ms (1.07x) | | server stream, 100 x 16 bytes | 0.797ms | 1.453ms (0.55x) | | server stream, 100 x 4KiB | 2.938ms | 7.875ms (0.37x) | | client stream, 100 x 16 bytes | 1.156ms | 19.250ms (0.06x) | | client stream, 100 x 4KiB | 2.250ms | 21.500ms (0.10x) |

The raw baseline above is a protobuf invoke, the fastest way to move the same bytes by hand — one per message for the client-streaming rows, which is what a hand-written client sending a sequence would do.

A unary call is within a few percent of a hand-written invoke — it no longer goes through Tauri's IPC at all. Unary requests are a plain fetch against the ipc-connect:// scheme the plugin registers, which skips the command router, the ACL check, and the protobuf envelope. See Unary skips IPC entirely.

Both streaming directions come out ahead of hand-written IPC because neither pays a webview crossing per message: responses arrive as http_body chunks carrying many envelopes, and requests are coalesced on the way out. See Streaming costs less than a crossing per message.

Why the IPC payload stays binary

Tauri's IPC payload is either raw bytes or JSON, never both, and a JSON payload encodes bytes as one JSON number per byte. Sending Connect's bytes as JSON command arguments costs, at 64KiB:

| Payload carried as | 64KiB request | | ---------------------- | ------------- | | raw bytes (what we do) | 0.375ms | | bytes inside JSON args | 5.063ms |

That is 13x, and it grows with size: the same comparison is 1.04x at 16 bytes and 2.4x at 4KiB, because the blow-up is in the encoding, not a fixed cost. A JSON invoke moving a plain string looks fast (0.375ms at 64KiB) — but a Connect message is bytes, and that is the row that applies.

Binary vs JSON Connect codec

A separate question from the one above: useBinaryFormat picks how a message is encoded, while the IPC payload stays raw bytes either way. It is close to free at these sizes, and binary stays the default:

| Codec | 16B | 4KiB | 64KiB | | ------ | ------- | ------- | ------- | | binary | 0.258ms | 0.313ms | 0.430ms | | JSON | 0.258ms | 0.309ms | 0.461ms |

JSON is worth it only for readable traffic in a devtools or proxy view; on an in-process hop there is no such view to gain, and it costs re-encoding on larger messages.

Streaming costs less than a crossing per message

A webview crossing costs far more than the bytes it carries, so both streaming directions are built to send fewer of them than there are messages.

Responses come free from the protocol: Connect's envelopes arrive as http_body chunks, so many messages ride in one frame. Measured, 100 streamed messages cross the IPC boundary as 2 frames, not 100 — where a naive Channel loop pays one crossing each.

Requests need help, because Connect hands the client one message at a time. Awaiting an invoke per message made a client-streaming call cost a full round trip per message — 100 messages took ~19ms, exactly tracking a hand-written loop of serial invokes. The pump now coalesces whatever the producer has already coalesced into one send, which takes the same 100 messages to ~1.2ms.

"Already produced" is the entire subtlety. The pump never waits for a chunk that has not been generated, so a message whose reply the client is waiting on still leaves immediately and alone. That is what keeps bidi interactive: a batching window measured in time would deadlock a conversation where the next request depends on the last response.

Unary skips IPC entirely

Tauri's IPC is a command router: a request crosses the webview boundary as an InvokeBody, is matched against a command name, checked against the ACL, then answered. A unary Connect call needs none of that. It is already an HTTP request against a tower::Service, and the webview already speaks HTTP.

So the plugin registers its own URI scheme, ipc-connect://, and unary calls go out as a plain fetch. Tauri's webview manager checks whether a scheme is already registered before installing its own handler, so this coexists with ipc:// rather than replacing it — every stock plugin keeps working.

What that removes from a unary call: the protobuf envelope and its encode/decode, the command-name dispatch, the ACL permission lookup, the call registry, and the channel. What is left is close to an identity mapping — http::Request in, service, http::Response out — which is why unary now lands within a few percent of a hand-written invoke rather than 15-20% above it.

Streaming keeps the command-and-channel path. A scheme responder is one-shot on every platform: it takes a complete response by value, and underneath it WKWebView does didReceiveResponse then a single didReceiveData, while WebKitGTK builds its stream from a finished buffer. Nothing can push a second frame, so routing a server-streaming response through the scheme would only deliver it once buffered whole — which is exactly what streaming exists to avoid.

The scheme is named ipc-connect rather than something like ipc+connect because on Windows and Android wry rewrites scheme://localhost to http://scheme.localhost, making the scheme name a hostname label. + is legal in a URI scheme but not in a hostname, so it would work on macOS and Linux and break on Windows.

custom-protocol is what makes Tauri serve the bundled assets. Without it, every build — release included — loads devUrl and needs npm run dev running, since Tauri picks dev-vs-bundled from that feature rather than from the cargo profile.

Limitations

  • Webview → Rust only. Rust-initiated calls into webview-hosted services are out of scope.
  • Compression is off by default. It spends CPU to shrink bytes on an in-process hop that never touches a network; the knob is exposed on both sides.
  • Android's IPC lacks InvokeBody::Raw and falls back to JSON number arrays. A base64 fallback is not implemented. This affects streaming only; unary goes over the ipc-connect:// scheme and is unaffected.
  • The unary path has been verified on macOS. The scheme registration and the Windows/Android hostname rewrite are handled, but are not yet exercised in CI on those platforms.