@cyberhub/trust-mibridge-core
v1.0.1
Published
Security Trust Report: @mibridge/[email protected] — 51/100 (C, standard). Maintainer risk, supply chain analysis from 8 security databases.
Maintainers
Readme
Security Trust Report: @mibridge/core
@mibridge/[email protected]: 51/100 | Grade: C | Tier: STANDARD (confidence: ±3)
Scanned on 2026-04-08 from 8 security databases. View package on npm →
TL;DR
- Package name "@mibridge/core" is 1 edit(s) from popular "cors"
- Pin your version and monitor for changes
Score Breakdown
Maintainer Trust: ████████████░░░░░░░░ 62/100
Package Health: ████████████████░░░░ 82/100
Supply Chain: ███░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ 13/100
Community: ████████░░░░░░░░░░░░ 40/100Why this score?
- Supply Chain is 13 because: risky dependencies
- Community is 40 because: no public GitHub repo linked (may be private or on another platform)
Vulnerabilities
✅ No known vulnerabilities detected across 8 security databases.
Key Risk Flags
- 🔴 CRITICAL: Package name "@mibridge/core" is 1 edit(s) from popular "cors"
- 🟠 HIGH: Primary maintainer account is less than 6 months old (1 days)
- 🟠 HIGH: No license declared
- 🟠 HIGH: Depends on historically compromised package: axios
- 🟠 HIGH: Depends on historically compromised package: tough-cookie
🛠️ What Should You Do?
Immediate:
Always: Pin version, run pkgtrust scan in CI, monitor at nrupak.com/trust/@mibridge/core
Maintainers (1)
- iblur01 ✅ 2FA (freemail) — Trust profile
Methodology: 18+ signals across 4 categories (Maintainer 35%, Package 25%, Supply Chain 25%, Community 15%). Full scoring docs →
Check your project: npm i -g @cyberhub/pkgtrust && pkgtrust scan @mibridge/core — CLI docs
Data Sources: GitHub Advisories · OSV.dev · npm audit · Snyk · Socket.dev · npms.io · Bundlephobia · deps.dev
Report by pkgtrust · Dashboard · Compare · CLI
This is an automated security report. Not affiliated with the @mibridge/core team. Updated 2026-04-08.
