@cyberhub/trust-recat
v1.0.0
Published
Security Trust Report: [email protected] — 65/100 (B, standard). Maintainer risk, supply chain analysis from 8 security databases.
Maintainers
Readme
Security Trust Report: recat
[email protected]: 65/100 | Grade: B | Tier: STANDARD (confidence: ±3)
Scanned on 2026-04-13 from 8 security databases. View package on npm →
TL;DR
- Package name "recat" is 2 edit(s) from popular "react"
- Pin your version and monitor for changes
Score Breakdown
Maintainer Trust: █████████████░░░░░░░ 66/100
Package Health: █████████████████░░░ 86/100
Supply Chain: ███████████░░░░░░░░░ 56/100
Community: ████████░░░░░░░░░░░░ 42/100Why this score?
- Supply Chain is 56 because: limited supply chain data
- Community is 42 because: no public GitHub repo linked (may be private or on another platform)
Vulnerabilities
✅ No known vulnerabilities detected across 8 security databases.
Key Risk Flags
- 🔴 CRITICAL: Package name "recat" is 2 edit(s) from popular "react"
🛠️ What Should You Do?
Immediate:
Always: Pin version, run pkgtrust scan in CI, monitor at nrupak.com/trust/recat
Maintainers (1)
- fengzilong ✅ 2FA (freemail) — Trust profile
Methodology: 18+ signals across 4 categories (Maintainer 35%, Package 25%, Supply Chain 25%, Community 15%). Full scoring docs →
Check your project: npm i -g @cyberhub/pkgtrust && pkgtrust scan recat — CLI docs
Data Sources: GitHub Advisories · OSV.dev · npm audit · Snyk · Socket.dev · npms.io · Bundlephobia · deps.dev · CISA KEV · Packagephobia · OpenSSF Scorecard · Ecosyste.ms · GitHub Enhanced · Keybase · npm Provenance
Report by pkgtrust · Dashboard · Compare · CLI
This is an automated security report. Not affiliated with the recat team. Updated 2026-04-13.
