@cyberhub/trust-slint
v1.0.0
Published
Security Trust Report: [email protected] — 59/100 (C+, standard). Maintainer risk, supply chain analysis from 8 security databases.
Maintainers
Readme
Security Trust Report: slint
[email protected]: 59/100 | Grade: C+ | Tier: STANDARD (confidence: ±3)
Scanned on 2026-04-13 from 8 security databases. View package on npm →
TL;DR
- Package name "slint" is 1 edit(s) from popular "eslint"
- Pin your version and monitor for changes
Score Breakdown
Maintainer Trust: ████████████████░░░░ 78/100
Package Health: ███████████████░░░░░ 74/100
Supply Chain: ██████░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ 28/100
Community: █████████░░░░░░░░░░░ 43/100Why this score?
- Supply Chain is 28 because: risky dependencies
- Community is 43 because: no public GitHub repo linked (may be private or on another platform)
Vulnerabilities
✅ No known vulnerabilities detected across 8 security databases.
Key Risk Flags
- 🔴 CRITICAL: Package name "slint" is 1 edit(s) from popular "eslint"
- 🟠 HIGH: Depends on historically compromised package: minimatch
- 🟠 HIGH: Depends on historically compromised package: semver
- 🟠 HIGH: 2 direct dependencies have known security issues
🛠️ What Should You Do?
Immediate:
Always: Pin version, run pkgtrust scan in CI, monitor at nrupak.com/trust/slint
Maintainers (3)
- munter ✅ 2FA (org email) — Trust profile
- papandreou ✅ 2FA (org email) — Trust profile
- msiebuhr ✅ 2FA (org email) — Trust profile
Methodology: 18+ signals across 4 categories (Maintainer 35%, Package 25%, Supply Chain 25%, Community 15%). Full scoring docs →
Check your project: npm i -g @cyberhub/pkgtrust && pkgtrust scan slint — CLI docs
Data Sources: GitHub Advisories · OSV.dev · npm audit · Snyk · Socket.dev · npms.io · Bundlephobia · deps.dev · CISA KEV · Packagephobia · OpenSSF Scorecard · Ecosyste.ms · GitHub Enhanced · Keybase · npm Provenance
Report by pkgtrust · Dashboard · Compare · CLI
This is an automated security report. Not affiliated with the slint team. Updated 2026-04-13.
