@hanna84/mcp-writing
v2.12.15
Published
MCP service for AI-assisted reasoning and editing on long-form fiction projects
Downloads
10,978
Maintainers
Readme
mcp-writing
An MCP service for AI-assisted reasoning and editing on long-form fiction projects.
Designed to work with OpenClaw but compatible with any MCP-capable AI gateway.
Quick launch
For local stdio MCP clients, run the published package directly:
WRITING_SYNC_DIR=/path/to/sync-dir DB_PATH=./writing.db npx -y @hanna84/mcp-writingThe CLI wrapper defaults to stdio transport and adds the Node 22 SQLite flag automatically when needed.
What it does
Instead of feeding an entire manuscript to an AI and hoping it fits in the context window, mcp-writing builds a structured index from your scene files. The AI queries that index first — finding relevant characters, beats, and loglines — then loads only the specific prose it needs.
Current status:
- Phase 1-3 completed: Metadata-first analysis, sidecar-backed metadata maintenance, and AI-assisted prose editing with confirmation + git history.
- Phase 4 delivered in part: Review bundles and Scrivener Direct extraction are complete; embedding search and reference-doc querying are intentionally deferred.
- Phase 5 in progress: OpenClaw runtime integration is active.
Who it is for
- Novelists and writing teams working on long manuscripts with many scenes, characters, and continuity constraints.
- AI-assisted editing workflows where you want targeted context retrieval instead of full-manuscript prompting.
- Projects that need traceable, reversible edits with metadata that stays synchronized as drafts evolve.
Documentation
| Guide | Description | |---|---| | docs/setup.md | Prerequisites, first-time setup, Scrivener import, native sync format | | docs/docker.md | Docker Compose, OpenClaw integration, SSH hardening | | docs/data-ownership.md | Which tools write which files, import safety rules | | docs/tools.md | Full tool reference — auto-generated from source | | docs/development.md | Running locally, tests, environment variables, troubleshooting |
Usage scenarios
1) Continuity pass before sending chapters to beta readers
Goal: catch inconsistencies before sharing pages.
- Run
syncafter your latest writing session. - Ask
find_scenesfor scenes involving a specific character or tag (for example, all scenes taggedinjuryorpromise). - Use
get_arcto review that character's ordered progression across the manuscript. - Load only the suspect scenes with
get_scene_prose. - Attach follow-up notes with
flag_scenewhere continuity needs a fix.
Outcome: you review one narrative thread at a time instead of rereading the entire novel to find contradictions.
2) Planning and tracking subplot beats during revisions
Goal: make sure subplot threads progress intentionally and resolve on time.
- Run
list_threadsfor the project. - Use
get_thread_arcto inspect scene order and beat labels for each thread. - When a beat is missing, call
upsert_thread_linkto add or update it on the right scene. - Re-run
get_thread_arcto confirm pacing and coverage.
Outcome: subplot structure stays visible and auditable, which reduces dropped threads in late drafts.
3) Tightening scene metadata after heavy prose edits
Goal: keep indexes accurate without manually re-tagging everything.
- After rewriting scenes, call
enrich_sceneto re-derive lightweight metadata from current prose. - Use
update_scene_metadatafor intentional editorial fields (for example, beat, POV, timeline position, and tags). - Use
search_metadataandfind_scenesto verify scenes are discoverable under the expected filters.
Outcome: your AI assistant can reliably find the right scenes without drifting from the manuscript.
4) Safe AI-assisted line edits with rollback
Goal: let AI propose prose edits without losing control of your draft.
- Ask the AI to call
propose_editfor a specific scene. - Review the staged diff.
- Accept with
commit_editor reject withdiscard_edit. - Use
list_snapshots(and optionalsnapshot_scene) to inspect or preserve revision history.
Outcome: you get AI speed with explicit approval and recoverable history for every applied change.
5) Refreshing scene-character links after imports or major rewrites
Goal: rebuild scene-to-character links in a controlled way after imported prose changes or metadata drift.
- Start with
enrich_scene_characters_batchusing the defaultdry_run=trueto preview inferred links for a project, chapter, or explicit scene list. - Poll
get_async_job_statusuntil the batch job completes, then reviewjob.result.resultsfor changed scenes, ambiguous matches, and partial failures. - Spot-check a few affected scenes with
get_scene_proseif the changes touch important continuity or cast-heavy chapters. - Re-run
enrich_scene_characters_batchwithdry_run=falseonce the preview looks correct. - If you want a destructive overwrite instead of additive merge behavior, use
replace_mode=replacewithconfirm_replace=truedeliberately.
Outcome: character-link maintenance becomes a preview-first batch operation instead of a one-off regex script or manual sidecar cleanup.
License
AGPL-3.0-only
