@heart-it/p2p-quorum
v0.1.0
Published
heartIT lab #11 — three Autobase indexers; a 2-of-3 majority keeps the checkpoint advancing while one member is gone, and the returner replays into the agreed order. Companion to 'Many Writers, One Truth'.
Downloads
160
Maintainers
Readme
p2p-quorum — heartIT lab #11
Companion lab for Part 6: Many Writers, One Truth: Autobase, Causal DAGs, and Quorum Consensus of the P2P from Scratch series on heartit.tech — this one implements the part's "Autobase Partition Recovery" capstone. No servers, no accounts; storage is a throwaway temp dir wiped on exit.
npx @heart-it/p2p-quorum new # terminal 1
npx @heart-it/p2p-quorum join <key> # terminals 2 and 3 (key printed by terminal 1)What you'll see
- every joiner admitted THROUGH the log as a writer and indexer — a real 3-member quorum
- type in any terminal — all three [view] columns converge to the same numbered order
- a live
[quorum]line whenever it changes:writers 3 · agreed 12 of 14 seen— agreed is what a majority of indexers has signed, seen is what this replica has applied; the gap is what consensus exists to close
The experiment
- Open all three terminals and type in each — every side converges, and
agreedcatches up toseenwithin a second or two (each ack round is a vote). - Ctrl-C terminal 3, keep typing in 1 and 2 —
agreedKEEPS advancing: 2 of 3 indexers is a majority, so the checkpoint moves without the missing member. - Re-run the same
joincommand in terminal 3 — it backfills the whole view, replays anything the majority reordered while it was gone, and converges.
The restarted terminal is a fresh temp store with a fresh local key, so it is re-admitted as a NEW writer — the [quorum] line honestly reads writers 4 (three of them alive). Real apps persist their store so a returning device keeps its identity; this lab trades that for a zero-setup demo.
What it maps to
Quorum consensus over a causal DAG: indexers ack what they have seen, and once a majority — ⌊n/2⌋+1, so 2 of 3 — acks a point, it becomes a signed checkpoint that can never reorder. That is why the checkpoint keeps advancing while one member is down, and why the returner replays against the AGREED order rather than its own: pending entries may still move, checkpointed ones cannot.
