npm package discovery and stats viewer.

Discover Tips

  • General search

    [free text search, go nuts!]

  • Package details

    pkg:[package-name]

  • User packages

    @[username]

Sponsor

Optimize Toolset

I’ve always been into building performant and accessible sites, but lately I’ve been taking it extremely seriously. So much so that I’ve been building a tool to help me optimize and monitor the sites that I build to make sure that I’m making an attempt to offer the best experience to those who visit them. If you’re into performant, accessible and SEO friendly sites, you might like it too! You can check it out at Optimize Toolset.

About

Hi, 👋, I’m Ryan Hefner  and I built this site for me, and you! The goal of this site was to provide an easy way for me to check the stats on my npm packages, both for prioritizing issues and updates, and to give me a little kick in the pants to keep up on stuff.

As I was building it, I realized that I was actually using the tool to build the tool, and figured I might as well put this out there and hopefully others will find it to be a fast and useful way to search and browse npm packages as I have.

If you’re interested in other things I’m working on, follow me on Twitter or check out the open source projects I’ve been publishing on GitHub.

I am also working on a Twitter bot for this site to tweet the most popular, newest, random packages from npm. Please follow that account now and it will start sending out packages soon–ish.

Open Software & Tools

This site wouldn’t be possible without the immense generosity and tireless efforts from the people who make contributions to the world and share their work via open source initiatives. Thank you 🙏

© 2026 – Pkg Stats / Ryan Hefner

@masterteam/properties

v0.0.71

Published

`PropertyForm` accepts a typed `scope` input. Route hosts should map their URL parameters to this domain contract instead of making the package understand application-specific route names.

Readme

@masterteam/properties

Property form scope

PropertyForm accepts a typed scope input. Route hosts should map their URL parameters to this domain contract instead of making the package understand application-specific route names.

import { type PropertiesScope, PropertyForm } from '@masterteam/properties';

readonly scope: PropertiesScope = {
  target: { type: 'module', id: 21 },
  parent: { type: 'level', id: 7 },
};
<mt-property-form [propertyId]="propertyId" [scope]="scope" />

When scope is supplied, the form applies it to PropertiesFacade and waits for that dispatch to complete before loading an existing property. This is required for cold create/edit routes because property requests, formula schema IDs, and save endpoints all depend on the effective scope. Visiting a list page first must never be required.

For backward compatibility, hosts that already initialize PropertiesFacade.setModuleInfo(...) before constructing the form can omit the input. New route and embedded integrations should prefer the explicit scope.

🤝 Contributing

Contributions are welcome! Please feel free to open an issue or submit a pull request.

📄 License

This project is licensed under the MIT License.