@oplink/core
v0.0.9
Published
MCP workflow orchestration and registry tool (provider-agnostic)
Maintainers
Readme
Workflows MCP v0.1.0
Built by @tedx_ai
Workflows MCP is a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that allows you to orchestrate / combine many prompts + MCP servers into compound MCP prompting tools.
Think of it like a dynamic prompting library that you can easily share and version control through yaml files that also lets your define how to best use many MCP tools across many MCP servers for specific tasks.
Overview
The key to effective MCP use is to know when/how to use the right tools. Workflows MCP helps make this process MUCH easier and faster. With Workflows MCP, you can:
✅ Combine prompts with MCP servers into reusable & easy to edit/share/organize workflows
✅ Trigger workflows with custom commands like: "enter debugger mode" or "use thinking mode"
✅ Define custom strategies for how to use many tools in a workflow (sequential or situational/dynamic)
✅ Easily onboard your team to the best prompts + ways to use many MCP tools w/ version control.
Bring your own workflows as simple YAML; share and version them with your team.
So why use this?
The goal of this project is to turn prompts into programmable tools and rules for AI in a code editor more deterministic while reducing the overall amount of token use across all requests. Since stuffing a global set of rules for AI can eat up your context window, using MCP to route to prompts and workflows can help reduce the overall amount of tokens used across all requests.
Workflows for MCP are also incredibly powerful! For instance, you can create an "production incident workflow" tool that has a special system prompt to reason about an incident in a particular way and then use a series of tools in a specific order to analyze + potentially resolve the incident. This may involve things like:
- Gathering logs across many MCP tools for Kubernetes, Cloudwatch, Splunk, etc
- Checking Github issues or a vector database for similar issues in the past
- Perform web searches for useful information on the web
- Analyze your code with all the gathered context from the prior steps
- Write a detailed incident report with all the context from the prior steps
- Gather input from you to better understand the problem space
- Implement a fix for issue if possible
And since these workflows are all defined in YAML and can be referenced from anywhere on your machine, you can easily rally your team around when/how to use the best prompts and sequences of MCP tools for specific tasks 🦾
Features
📝 Custom Configuration
- Load custom configs from multiple YAML files in a
.workflowsor.mcp-workflowsdirectory - Easily save these yaml files to a git repo and share with your team
- Since MCP servers can have custom configs for each project, you can easily pick and choose which configs to use for each project - setting up custom workflow folders for each project
- Support for typed parameter inputs in tool configurations makes building custom MCP prompting tools a breeze
🚀 Example Workflows
Use the examples in this repo (or your own) to seed your .mcp-workflows/ directory. You can define prompt‑only tools or scripted multi‑step workflows that call external MCP servers.
Installation
Install the MCP server into an MCP client using the following command or JSON:
npx -y @agentdesk/workflows-mcp@latestIf using JSON in Cursor to setup your MCP server, you can use the following config:
{
"mcpServers": {
"workflows-mcp": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "@agentdesk/workflows-mcp@latest"]
}
}
}To provide custom configurations, you can use the --config flag to point to a directory containing YAML configuration files. The directory must be named .workflows or .mcp-workflows as so:
npx @agentdesk/workflows-mcp@latest --config /path/to/.workflowsHere's what this would look like in a Cursor config all combined:
{
"mcpServers": {
"workflows-mcp": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"@agentdesk/workflows-mcp@latest --config /path/to/.workflows"
]
}
}
}Note:
- If you update your config, you must refresh the MCP tool
- If refreshing doesn't work, make sure your config is valid YAML
- If you're still having issues, then try removing & renaming the MCP tool in your client
- If no config is provided, the server will start without user workflows.
- If you're still not able to get this working, open an issue ticket
Custom Workflow Configs
Create a .workflows or .mcp-workflows directory in your project and add YAML configuration files with any name (must end with .yaml or .yml).
Example Configuration Files
Basic Workflow Configuration
workflow_name:
description: "Description of what this workflow does"
prompt: |
Enter your multi-line
prompt here like this
toolMode: "situational" # can be omitted as it's the default
tools: "analyzeLogs, generateReport, validateFindings"Tools Configuration Styles
You can define tools in several ways.
Here's an example of a tool that debugs a problem in a codebase with tools used situationally / as needed:
web_debugger_mode:
description: Debug my codebase my web application with browser logs and BrowserTools MCP
prompt: |
Deeply reflect upon all of this and think about why this isn't working. Theorize 4-6 different possible sources of the problem.
Then, deeply reason about the root cause and distill your theories down to the 1-2 most probable sources of the problem before suggesting next steps.
tools: getConsoleLogs, getConsoleErrors, getNetworkLogs, getNetworkErrors, takeScreenshotThis will return the following MCP response:
Deeply reflect upon all of this and think about why this isn't working. Theorize 4-6 different possible sources of the problem.
## Available Tools
Use these tools as needed to complete the user's request:
- getConsoleLogs
- getConsoleErrors
- getNetworkLogs
- getNetworkErrors
- takeScreenshot
After using each tool, return a 'Next Steps' section with a list of the next steps to take / remaining tools to invoke along with each tool's prompt/description and 'optional' flag if present.Parameter Injection
A powerful feature is the ability to inject parameters into your prompts using the {{ parameter_name }} syntax:
custom_mode:
description: "Workflow with parameter injection"
parameters:
thought:
type: "string"
description: "A thought to deeply reflect upon"
required: true
idea:
type: "string"
description: "An additional idea to consider"
prompt: |
Deeply reflect upon the provided thought.
Here's the thought: {{ thought }}
Additional idea to consider: {{ idea }}
Reflect upon the implications/tradeoffs it may have as it relates to my current goals.Parameters are automatically validated based on their type definitions and injected into your prompts at runtime.
Sequential Tool Configuration
In sequential mode, tools are executed in a specific order:
web_debugger_mode:
description: Debug my codebase my web application with browser logs and BrowserTools MCP
prompt: |
Deeply reflect upon all of this and think about why this isn't working. Theorize 4-6 different possible sources of the problem.
toolMode: sequential
tools: getConsoleLogs, getConsoleErrors, getNetworkLogs, getNetworkErrors, takeScreenshotThis will return the following MCP response:
Deeply reflect upon all of this and think about why this isn't working. Theorize 4-6 different possible sources of the problem.
## Available Tools
If all required user input/feedback is acquired or if no input/feedback is needed, execute this exact sequence of tools to complete this task:
1. getConsoleLogs
2. getConsoleErrors
3. getNetworkLogs
4. getNetworkErrors
5. takeScreenshot
After using each tool, return a 'Next Steps' section with a list of the next steps to take / remaining tools to invoke along with each tool's prompt/description and 'optional' flag if present.Advanced Tool Configuration
Includes ability to define prompts for each tool and an optional flag to indicate if the tool is optional or not in the sequence:
deep_thinking_mode:
description: Reflect on a thought and produce a reflection/new set of thoughts
parameters:
thought:
type: string
description: A thought to deeply reflect upon
required: true
prompt: |
Deeply reflect upon the provided thought.
Reflect upon the implications/tradeoffs it may have as it relates to my current goals, challenges and our conversation.
Do not change anything in our system, just return some thoughts/considerations/analysis based on your reflection of the provided thought.
toolMode: "sequential"
tools:
analyze_thought: analyze a previously generated thought
explore_perspectives: think about additional perspectives given the analysis
apply_findings:
propmt: implement the findings of the analysis
optional: trueConfiguration Structure
Each YAML file should contain a mapping of tool names to their configuration. Configurations are loaded from user-defined files in .workflows or .mcp-workflows.
Basic Tool Configuration
For each tool, you can specify:
name: Optional name override for the registered tool (default is the config key)description: Description of what the workflow/tool doesprompt: Custom promptcontext: Additional context to append to the prompttools: Array or object of tools available in this mode, with flexible definition stylestoolMode: Mode of tool execution, either "sequential" or "situational" (defaults to "situational")parameters: Object mapping of parameters as input to the tool - supports template injection using {{ parameter_name }}disabled: Boolean to disable the tool
Input Parameter Configuration
Tools can accept typed parameters that an MCP Client / agent can provide to improve reasoning capabilities for your prompt/workflow. These inputs are automatically converted to Zod schemas for validation and type safety. Each parameter is defined with the following properties:
| Property | Description | Required |
| ------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------ |
| type | Data type: "string", "number", "boolean", "array", "object", or "enum" | Yes |
| description | Human-readable description of the parameter | No |
| required | Whether the parameter is required | No (defaults to false) |
| default | Default value if not provided | No |
| enum | Array of valid values (required for enum type only) | Yes (for enum type) |
| items | For array types, defines the type of items in the array | No |
| properties | For object types, defines the properties of the object | No |
Example Input Parameter Types
# String parameter
name:
type: "string"
description: "User's name"
required: true
# Number parameter with default
limit:
type: "number"
description: "Maximum items to return"
default: 10
# Boolean parameter with default
includeArchived:
type: "boolean"
description: "Include archived items"
default: false
# Enum parameter with predefined options
sortOrder:
type: "enum"
enum: ["asc", "desc"]
description: "Sort direction"
default: "asc"
# Array parameter with item type
tags:
type: "array"
description: "List of tags to filter by"
items:
type: "string"
description: "A tag value"
# Object parameter with nested properties
filters:
type: "object"
description: "Complex filter object"
properties:
status:
type: "enum"
enum: ["active", "inactive", "pending"]
description: "Status filter"
dateRange:
type: "object"
properties:
start:
type: "string"
description: "Start date"
end:
type: "string"
description: "End date"Configuration Loading
The system loads configurations from your .workflows or .mcp-workflows directory.
When merging configurations:
- Tool arrays are concatenated rather than replaced
- Other properties are overridden by the user-defined configuration
- Parameters are merged with user-defined parameters taking precedence
How It Works
Workflows MCP operates through a sophisticated configuration and tool registration system:
Configuration Loading and Merging
- Loads user-defined configurations from
.workflowsor.mcp-workflowsdirectories - Supports both sequential and situational tool execution modes
- Supports both sequential and situational tool execution modes
- Loads user-defined configurations from
Tool Registration and Validation
- Each tool is dynamically registered with the MCP server based on the merged configuration
- Tools can be customized with:
- Custom names and descriptions
- Typed parameters with validation
- Custom prompts
- Sequential or situational execution strategies
- Validates tool configurations and parameters at registration time
Parameter Handling
- Parameters are defined using a type-safe configuration system
- Supports multiple parameter types: string, number, boolean, array, object, and enum
- Automatically converts parameter definitions to Zod schemas for runtime validation
- Provides automatic validation of parameter values during tool execution
Prompt Management
- Manages prompts through a flexible system that supports custom user-defined prompts
- Additional context injection
- Dynamic tool availability based on mode
- Supports both static and dynamic prompt generation based on configuration
- Manages prompts through a flexible system that supports custom user-defined prompts
Error Handling and Debugging
- Comprehensive error handling during configuration loading and tool execution
- Detailed logging for debugging and troubleshooting
- Graceful fallbacks when configurations or tools are missing
- Runtime validation of tool inputs and configurations
This architecture allows for powerful, type-safe interactions between tools and clients while maintaining flexibility through configuration-driven customization.
License
MIT
