@pipeworx/esef-filings

XBRL filings index MCP — published company annual reports from the filings.xbrl.org index run by XBRL International, plus the IFRS financial facts inside each one. Keyless.

Part of Pipeworx — an MCP gateway connecting AI agents to 1684+ live data sources.

The European counterpart to sec-xbrl: same idea (accounting facts straight out of a regulator's XBRL), different filing regime.

Tools

• esef_search_filings(entity_name?, country?, regime?, year?, period_end?, period_end_from?, period_end_to?, with_errors?, sort?, limit?, page?) — search the index. Returns company name, LEI or national identifier, country, regime, period end, XBRL validation error/warning counts, report language and links to the xBRL-JSON, HTML report, viewer and package. Any argument not in this list is rejected with a user_error naming the accepted set — it is never silently dropped (see GOTCHA 1).
• esef_entity_filings(entity, limit?) — every filing for one company, resolving a name, LEI or national registration number. Returns what it resolved to and how, plus filings grouped into distinct reports (see "Language editions" below).
• esef_filing_facts(fxo_id? | entity?, year?, concept?, include_dimensioned?, limit?) — the second hop. Opens the filing's xBRL-JSON report and returns named IFRS facts with value, currency, period and concept.

esef_search_filings and esef_entity_filings prove a filing exists; only esef_filing_facts returns money.

Scope

25,640 filings under exactly two reporting regimes:

| Regime | Filings | Countries | |---|---|---| | ESEF | ~15,996 | AT BE CY CZ DK ES FI FR GB GR IS IT LT NL NO PL PT RO SE | | UAIFRS | ~9,644 | UA |

The pack name says ESEF; the source is broader than ESEF. Both country and regime are first-class filters so a caller can pin the scope they meant. See GOTCHA 2 below — this is not a cosmetic detail.

Auth

None. No key, no account, no rate-limit documentation published.

filings.xbrl.org is a nonprofit index, so the pack is deliberately quiet with it: one index request per call, at most one report fetch, no probing or fan-out, and a real contactable User-Agent (Pipeworx/1.0 (+https://pipeworx.io; [email protected])).

Gotchas

GOTCHA 1 — a wrong filter param is silently ignored, not rejected

This is the dangerous one and it is why filter construction lives in exactly one helper.

The API takes JSON:API filters in two forms:

?filter%5Bcountry%5D=FI     bracketed shortcut, percent-encoded  -> meta.count 1168, Finnish records
?country=FI                 bracketed form written WITHOUT the brackets
                            -> HTTP 200, meta.count 25640, first record Ukrainian

The second is the entire unfiltered index wearing a successful filtered query's clothes. Same status code, same envelope, same field names — nothing to catch.

Two defences, both in src/index.ts:

1. The pack never uses the bracketed shortcut for filters. It uses the flask-rest-jsonapi complex form, ?filter=[{"name":"country","op":"eq","val":"FI"}] — a single unbracketed param, so there is no bracket encoding to get wrong, and a bad attribute name is rejected loudly (HTTP 400 "FilingSchema has no attribute bogus") instead of ignored. Only page[size] / page[number] are bracketed, and they go through buildUrl(), which uses URLSearchParams (which percent-encodes brackets).
2. verifyFilters() re-checks the returned rows against what was asked for. Every esef_search_filings response carries filters_applied, filters_verified and filter_mismatches, so a filter that somehow failed to bite shows up in the payload rather than quietly widening the answer.

The same failure mode existed one layer up, on our own tool boundary, and got fixed the same way (fleet #2317). esef_search_filings never declared period_end_from/period_end_to, so a caller who guessed those (a plausible name for a date range) had the arguments silently dropped by the handler — no schema error, filters_requested echoed them as null, and the response still claimed filters_verified: true. A date-bounded query for Portugal returned the identical 128-row unfiltered total as a query with no date at all. Fixed two ways: period_end_from/period_end_to are now real, declared range filters (op: 'ge'/'le' against period_end, verified by verifyFilters() like every other filter), and rejectUnknownArgs() throws a user_error naming the accepted argument list for anything else the caller might guess — so an undeclared argument can no longer be dropped silently, whatever its name.

GOTCHA 2 — this index is not ESEF-only, and saying otherwise is a wrong answer

An unfiltered probe's first record is Ukrainian: EDRPOU-32033791-2020-12-31-UAIFRS-UA-0. 38% of the index is UAIFRS. Describing the pack as "European filings" while it can return Ukraine is the resolver-grain trap — the caller gets a confident answer at the wrong grain.

So: every tool description names both regimes out loud, regime is a filter, every returned row states its own country and regime, and search responses carry a scope_note. If you edit a description, keep the scope sentence in it.

GOTCHA 3 — the same annual report is indexed once per language edition

Citycon's FY2022 appears twice — …-ESEF-FI-1 (Finnish) and …-ESEF-FI-0 (English) — identical figures, different fxo_id. Counting index rows as reports inflates a company's filing history: Citycon has 11 filings but 6 distinct financial years.

esef_entity_filings therefore returns both filing_count (index rows) and report_count (distinct years), and groups editions under a preferred_edition — English when available, since the narrative facts are then readable. esef_filing_facts picks the English edition when resolving from a company name.

Note this is not what the language dimension inside a report does. Each xBRL-JSON document is single-language; the language variance is one level up, across filings.

GOTCHA 4 — one figure is tagged many times inside a report

Citycon's FY2022 ifrs-full:ProfitLoss of EUR 5,100,000 appears three times with byte-identical dimensions (primary statement, notes, equity reconciliation), plus further copies broken down by ComponentsOfEquityAxis. Returned naively that is one profit figure looking like six different ones.

esef_filing_facts groups on every dimension except language, collapses identical values, and reports occurrences (how many taggings backed the value) and dedup.repeat_taggings_collapsed. Axis-dimensioned breakdowns are excluded by default (include_dimensioned: false) and counted in dedup.dimensioned_facts_excluded. Genuinely contradictory values for one dimension set surface in conflicting_values rather than being silently picked between.

GOTCHA 5 — json_url can be null

About 1.5% of index rows have no machine-readable report, and in the sampled cases report_url and viewer_url were null too — the row is metadata only (e.g. Cloetta AB 549300CSLHPO6Y1AZN37-2021-12-31-ESEF-SE-1, which has error_count: 1 and only a package zip). esef_filing_facts returns {found: false, reason: 'no_machine_readable_report'} naming whatever URL did survive, instead of throwing.

GOTCHA 6 — entities are addressed by identifier, not by id

A JSON:API entity record carries both id: "1597" and attributes.identifier: "549300P8N0P6KDGTJ206". Only the identifier is addressable: /api/entities/1597 returns 404.

Worse, the identifier is not always the fxo_id prefix. Ukrainian filings use EDRPOU-32033791-… in the fxo_id but are addressed as plain 32033791. Joining filings to entity names on the fxo_id prefix left every Ukrainian filing with entity_name: null; the pack joins on the tail of relationships.entity.links.related instead.

GOTCHA 7 — xBRL instants are stamped one day late

An xBRL-JSON instant period of 2023-01-01T00:00:00 is the 2022-12-31 balance sheet — the instant is the start of the following day. Reading the raw string is a full year of error. describePeriod() normalises both forms, so period_end and period_label ("as at 2022-12-31", "2022-01-01 to 2022-12-31") are already corrected.

GOTCHA 8 — narrative notes are tagged as facts

DisclosureOfShareCapitalReservesAndOtherEquityInterestExplanatory in Citycon's FY2022 report is 2,500 characters of prose. Text values are clipped at 600 characters with value_truncated / value_length set, and within a period measured figures sort ahead of narrative, so concept: "Equity" leads with the EUR 2,310,300,000 balance rather than pages of note text.

GOTCHA 9 — the index lags the filing season; current-year coverage is close to empty

This is not a bug in the pack, but it is the gotcha that actually costs users, and it went undocumented for a while (fleet #2317 — an external developer independently measured these same counts and rejected the pack over it). filings.xbrl.org is a voluntary community index, not a real-time regulator feed: a company's annual report typically lands weeks to months after the reporting period closes and after XBRL International (or a national collector) has processed it.

Measured live 2026-09-23 via esef_search_filings with the year filter:

| Country | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | |---|---|---|---| | PT | 7 | 7 | 0 (before CMVM — see GOTCHA 10) | | ES | 125 | 113 | 1 (before CNMV — see GOTCHA 11) |

A search for the current calendar year will typically come back with few or zero rows — that reflects upstream lag, not a broken query or a country with no filers. If you are building a pipeline that expects near-real-time coverage of the current fiscal year, this index will disappoint you; the prior 1-2 calendar years is where it is actually populated. Every esef_search_filings response (matches and no-matches alike) now carries this as a machine-readable coverage_note so a caller learns it from the tool rather than from a query that quietly returns zero. The note is built per response and quotes no counts (fleet #2379 — a frozen "Spain 2025 = 1" sat beside a live total_matching of 118 the day CNMV merged): a search pinned to PT, ES, NO or SE says its rows follow the regulator's publication, and says the opposite if that regulator's index could not be read; any other search gets the lag warning. Every row names its own source. The table above is a dated snapshot of the index alone, not current coverage.

GOTCHA 10 — Portugal comes from two places, and each row says which

filings.xbrl.org carried 7 Portuguese filings for 2024 and 0 for 2025, against roughly 50 Portuguese issuers a year that publish an ESEF package with CMVM (Comissão do Mercado de Valores Mobiliários), Portugal's regulator and officially appointed storage mechanism. Jerónimo Martins' FY2025 report was published on CMVM on 2026-03-30 and had still not reached filings.xbrl.org six months later (fleet #2320).

So Portuguese filings also come from CMVM:

• esef_search_filings with country: "PT" (or with no country and a company name CMVM knows) merges both sources and deduplicates by LEI + period end — a report on both appears once. source is cmvm or xbrl.org; the other copy is named in also_on_xbrl_org / also_on_cmvm; merge.duplicates_collapsed counts what was folded.
• CMVM rows carry published_at (CMVM's official publication time, Lisbon offset), first_published_at (issuers often publish the report "to be submitted to the AGM" and later the AGM-approved version — one row, both listed under versions), indexed_at, the package package_sha256 and CMVM's own ESEF viewer_url. xbrl.org rows only carry date_added, the day that index picked the report up — not a publication date.
• CMVM filing ids look like cmvm-1355933; pass one to esef_filing_facts as fxo_id. Resolving by company name or LEI prefers the CMVM copy for the latest period.
• CMVM rows have no validation run, so error_count/warning_count are null and a with_errors: true search skips CMVM.
• Every response that consulted CMVM carries cmvm_status with last_successful_check, last_error and stale (no successful check in 48 hours). That is the difference between "CMVM published nothing new" and "CMVM could not be checked" — the second must never read as the first. Outside the Pipeworx gateway (a bare npm install), cmvm_status.available is false and Portuguese rows come from filings.xbrl.org alone.
• A few 2023 CMVM packages contain a plain XHTML report with no inline XBRL at all; those rows list with has_machine_readable_report: false.

GOTCHA 11 — Spain comes from two places too (CNMV)

filings.xbrl.org carried 113 Spanish filings for 2024 and 1 for 2025, while every Spanish listed issuer files its annual financial report, with an ESEF package, in CNMV's official register (Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores, Spain's regulator). Técnicas Reunidas' FY2025 package was published there on 2026-02-26 (fleet #2351).

So Spanish filings also come from CNMV, exactly as Portugal's come from CMVM (GOTCHA 10), with the same merge, dedup by LEI + period end, and freshness contract:

• source is cnmv; the other copy is also_on_xbrl_org / also_on_cnmv. Every response that consulted CNMV carries cnmv_status (same fields as cmvm_status; stale after 48 hours without a successful check).
• CNMV filing ids are the register number: cnmv-20912. Rows also carry national_identifier (the issuer's Spanish NIF, e.g. A-28092583) and report_scope (consolidated or individual). An issuer that puts individual and consolidated accounts in one package gets one row each, cnmv-<n> and cnmv-<n>-2, labelled; the consolidated row is the one matched against filings.xbrl.org.
• published_at is CNMV's own time: to the minute (Madrid offset) when CNMV's disclosure feed carries the filing, otherwise the register's publication date only. first_published_at and versions work as for CMVM.
• The issuer universe is every issuer that filed an annual financial report in CNMV's disclosure feed since 2023, read daily.

GOTCHA 12 — Norway comes from Oslo Børs NewsWeb, because filings.xbrl.org stopped

filings.xbrl.org stopped adding Norwegian filings on 2025-05-21: 220 NO filings for FY2024, 0-2 for FY2025. Every Oslo-listed issuer publishes its annual financial report as an announcement on Oslo Børs NewsWeb (category 1001, ÅRSRAPPORT / ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT) with the ESEF package attached. Equinor's FY2025 package was attached there on 2026-03-19 and never reached filings.xbrl.org (fleet #2356).

Same merge, dedup by LEI + period end, and freshness contract as GOTCHA 10/11:

• source is newsweb; the other copy is also_on_xbrl_org / also_on_newsweb. Every response that consulted NewsWeb carries newsweb_status (same fields as cmvm_status).
• NewsWeb filing ids are newsweb-<messageId>-<attachmentId>, e.g. newsweb-668785-321602 (Equinor FY2025). viewer_url is the announcement page; published_at is the announcement time (UTC).
• The package is attached to only one of the two language versions of an announcement, and corrections are separate announcements; byte-identical re-attachments are folded into one row. Different packages for the same LEI + period (a corrected package, a second language) are one row with versions.
• The LEI comes from the inline XBRL, never from the attachment name (issuers choose it: eqnr-2025-12-31-1-nb.zip).
• Category 1001 also carries PDF-only reports (bond issuers, foreign issuers); those have no row here.

GOTCHA 13 — Sweden comes from Finansinspektionen (FI)

filings.xbrl.org stopped ingesting Sweden on 2025-05-08: its newest Swedish row was added that day, and it has 0 Swedish FY2025 reports (339 for FY2024). Every Swedish issuer files its annual report, with an ESEF package, in Finansinspektionen's Börsinformation database, Sweden's officially appointed mechanism (survey: docs/esef-freshness-survey.md Part 5).

So Swedish filings also come from FI, with the same merge, dedup by LEI + period end, and freshness contract as GOTCHA 10-12:

• source is fi; the other copy is also_on_xbrl_org / also_on_fi. Every response that consulted FI carries fi_status (same fields as cmvm_status).
• FI filing ids are FI's file id: fi-61807 (Ericsson FY2025). published_at is FI's publication time to the minute, Stockholm offset.
• An issuer that files a Swedish and an English edition has two FI packages for one LEI + period; they are one row, with the English edition served and both under versions.
• The LEI comes from the report's inline XBRL (then the package's root folder, then FI's issuer page) — never from the file name: Volvo's package is named abvolvo-….

GOTCHA 14 — a company NAME can resolve to the wrong issuer

Name resolution runs on filings.xbrl.org first, and the shortest matching name wins. "Ericsson" matches ERICSSON NIKOLA TESLA d.d. (Croatia) there, and Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson's FY2025 is only in the FI index — so esef_filing_facts {entity:"Ericsson", year:2025} used to answer a confident no_filing_for_year (fleet #2372).

When esef_filing_facts resolves by name and the picked issuer has no filing for the requested year, it now searches the regulator indexes (CMVM, CNMV, NewsWeb, FI, FSMA STORI, MSE, HANFA SRPI) for other issuers whose name matches and who do:

• exactly one → that issuer's report is used, and resolved_by says the name first matched someone else;
• more than one → reason: "ambiguous_entity" with candidates (name, country, LEI, source, filing_id); the tool never guesses.

It does not help when the wrong issuer HAS a filing for that year: "Santander" with year: 2025 resolves to Santander UK plc on filings.xbrl.org, not Banco Santander. Pass the LEI when the name is common.

GOTCHA 15 — Belgium comes from two places: FSMA STORI fills the gaps

filings.xbrl.org carries Belgium only partly: 47 FY2025 filings from 33 issuers, and nothing Belgian added since 2026-05-12. The FSMA's STORI database, Belgium's officially appointed mechanism, lists 106 issuers with an inline-XBRL FY2025 annual report; every one of xbrl.org's 33 is among them (survey: docs/esef-freshness-survey.md Part 7, fleet #2405).

Same merge, dedup by LEI + period end, and freshness contract as GOTCHA 10-13:

• source is fsma; the other copy is also_on_xbrl_org / also_on_fsma. Every response that consulted STORI carries fsma_status (same fields as cmvm_status).
• STORI filing ids are STORI's file id: fsma-5c08f790-404c-4121-bd0b-0cf3350455da (AB InBev FY2025). published_at is the issuer's publication time as STORI records it (Brussels offset); received_at is when STORI received the report, often days later (AB InBev FY2025: published 2026-02-12, received 2026-02-19). national_identifier is the KBO/BCE company number.
• STORI holds up to three language editions per report (nl, fr, en); one is collected, English first. Issuers file the package as .zip or .xbri (Report Package 1.0); a few file only the bare .xhtml, which is converted as it is.
• Publications with no inline XBRL (PDF only: certificates, funds, some non-EU issuers) have no row; the index lists them under publications_without_inline_xbrl.
• The LEI comes from the inline XBRL, then the package root folder, then STORI's listing — never from the file name (abinbev-2023-12-31-en (1).zip).

GOTCHA 16 — Malta comes only from the Malta Stock Exchange OAM for FY2025

filings.xbrl.org stopped ingesting Malta on 2025-05-21: MT FY2024 = 46 filings, FY2025 = 0. The Malta Stock Exchange runs Malta's officially appointed mechanism, and every annual-report announcement there links the issuer's ESEF ZIP: 97 FY2025 packages from 92 issuers in the last 12 months, measured 2026-09-25 (survey: docs/esef-freshness-survey.md Part 9, fleet #2431).

Same merge, dedup by LEI + period end, and freshness contract as GOTCHA 10-15:

• source is mse; the other copy is also_on_xbrl_org / also_on_mse. Every response that consulted it carries mse_status (same fields as cmvm_status).
• MSE filing ids are the CDN folder name, which spells out symbol, period end, scope, LEI and upload time: mse-BOV_20251231_CON_AFR_529900RWC8ZYB066JF16_20260326114707204 (Bank of Valletta FY2025). published_at is the OAM announcement time (Malta offset).
• Most Maltese issuers are bond-issuing finance companies that file company-only accounts: 41 of the 97 FY2025 packages are IND (report_scope: "individual"), the other 56 CON ("consolidated"). ESEF only requires tagging for consolidated IFRS statements, and every IND package measured is a plain untagged XHTML: those rows are listed with has_machine_readable_report: false, and esef_filing_facts has no figures for them.
• Non-December year ends are common (MaltaPost 30 Sep, Farsons 31 Jan). year filters on the period end, as everywhere in this pack.
• The exchange's terms let anyone save and reproduce the files provided "the source is to be stated and the material not altered or distorted": rows name the source, packages are stored as downloaded.

GOTCHA 17 — Croatia comes only from HANFA SRPI

filings.xbrl.org stopped adding Croatian filings on 2025-05-21: HR FY2024 = 30, FY2025 = 0. HANFA's SRPI, Croatia's officially appointed mechanism, received 178 annual-report submissions carrying an ESEF package from 77 issuers in 2026 (survey: docs/esef-freshness-survey.md Part 11, fleet #2435).

• source is hanfa; the other copy, where one exists, is also_on_xbrl_org / also_on_hanfa. Every response that consulted SRPI carries hanfa_status (same fields as cmvm_status).
• SRPI filing ids are SRPI's submission number: hanfa-1214588 (Hrvatski Telekom FY2025, English, consolidated). published_at is when SRPI received the submission (Zagreb offset).
• Croatian issuers file separate consolidated and non-consolidated packages, each its own submission, often in Croatian and English too. They are distinct rows labelled by report_scope (consolidated / individual); the language editions of one scope are one row, English served, all under versions.
• A correction is a new SRPI submission and the old one stays listed. Every package is kept; the newest converted package per LEI + period + scope is served.
• Submissions that carry no ESEF package (a PDF, or HANFA's own XLSX "GFI" form) have no row; the index lists them under submissions_without_esef.
• The listing's contact column (the filer's named contact person, phone and e-mail) is never collected.

GOTCHA 18 — Hungary comes from the MNB: filings.xbrl.org stopped in May 2025

filings.xbrl.org stopped adding Hungarian filings on 2025-05-21 (HU FY2024 = 29 filings, FY2025 = 0) and never carried OTP Bank or Richter Gedeon. Every issuer files its ESEF package with the MNB's Közzétételek site (kozzetetelek.mnb.hu), Hungary's officially appointed mechanism (survey: docs/esef-freshness-survey.md Part 12, fleet #2437).

Same merge, dedup by LEI + period end, and freshness contract as GOTCHA 10-17:

• source is mnb; the other copy is also_on_xbrl_org / also_on_mnb. Every response that consulted the MNB carries mnb_status.
• Filing ids are the MNB document id: mnb-909016 (OTP Bank FY2025, English package). published_at is the MNB publication time (Budapest offset). national_identifier is the MNB's "Intézmény törzsszáma" company number, not an LEI; the LEI comes from the inline XBRL, then the package root folder, then the <LEI>-<period>-… file name.
• Issuers attach one package per language (…-en.zip, …-hu.zip); one is collected, English first. A disclosure that carries two reports (separate and consolidated) gives one row each.
• Some ZIPs attached beside the package hold only PDFs (MOL's "other documents"); they have no row and are listed under publications_without_inline_xbrl.
• The MNB's copyright statement allows free reuse if any transformation is stated, so esef_filing_facts on an MNB filing carries a transformation line: the figures are converted from the issuer's iXBRL, they are the issuer's, not the MNB's.

GOTCHA 19 — Lithuania merges oam.lt with filings.xbrl.org

filings.xbrl.org carries Lithuania only in part (FY2025: 17 issuers, nothing added since 2026-05-12) and never had Ignitis Group. oam.lt, the central storage of regulated information that Nasdaq Vilnius runs as Lithuania's officially appointed mechanism, carries every issuer's annual report (survey: docs/esef-freshness-survey.md Part 13, fleet #2453). LT rows merge both by LEI + period end.

• source is oamlt; the other copy is also_on_xbrl_org / also_on_oamlt. Every response that consulted oam.lt carries oamlt_status.
• Filing ids are oamlt-<messageId>-<attachmentId>: oamlt-468051-338788 (Ignitis grupė FY2025). published_at is the announcement time (Vilnius offset).
• The issuer label on oam.lt is Nasdaq's short name ("Ignitis grupe"); the LEI comes only from the inline XBRL.
• Not every annual-report attachment is an ESEF package: Ignitis wraps its package in a .7z inside the ZIP (unwrapped), many issuers e-sign it as an ASiC-E container (.asice), and Telia Lietuva files a bare XHTML with no inline XBRL (listed under publications_without_inline_xbrl, no row). Amber Grid's FY2025 annual report is on filings.xbrl.org but the backfill collected no package for it from oam.lt (only its "Operating Results" message, which has none); its row comes from the index.
• A corrected report is a new oam.lt message; the newest converted package per LEI + period is served.

Data sources

• Index: https://filings.xbrl.org/api/filings (JSON:API, header Accept: application/vnd.api+json)
• Entities: https://filings.xbrl.org/api/entities, …/api/entities/<identifier>/filings
• Reports: root-relative json_url resolved against https://filings.xbrl.org — xBRL-JSON (OIM), {documentInfo, facts}, typically 500 KB–1 MB
• Portugal: CMVM annual-accounts disclosures (https://www.cmvm.pt), ESEF packages as published by each issuer, facts in the same xBRL-JSON shape
• Spain: CNMV annual financial report register (https://www.cnmv.es/portal/consultas/ifa/listadoifa.aspx?id=0&nif=<NIF>), ESEF packages as published by each issuer, converted the same way (scripts/esef-cmvm/collect_cnmv.py)
• Norway: Oslo Børs NewsWeb annual-report announcements (https://api3.oslo.oslobors.no/v1/newsreader/list?category=1001, keyless), ESEF packages as attached by each issuer, converted the same way (scripts/esef-cmvm/collect_newsweb.py)
• Sweden: Finansinspektionen Börsinformation (https://finanscentralen.fi.se/search/SearchByRegistrationDate.aspx, file GetFile.aspx?fid=<N>), ESEF packages as published by each issuer, converted the same way (scripts/esef-cmvm/collect_fi.py)
• Belgium: FSMA STORI (https://webapi.fsma.be/api/v1/en/stori/result, keyless JSON; file …/stori/download?fileDataId=<uuid>), ESEF packages as published by each issuer, converted the same way (scripts/esef-cmvm/collect_fsma.py)
• Malta: the Malta Stock Exchange's Officially Appointed Mechanism (named, not linked: the exchange's terms prohibit linking to its site without written permission), ESEF packages as published by each issuer, converted the same way (scripts/esef-cmvm/collect_mse.py). Maltese rows carry no source_url / viewer_url for the same reason.
• Croatia: HANFA SRPI (https://www.hanfa.hr/Api/SRPI/GetData, keyless form POST; file https://www.hanfa.hr/SRPI/<HR|EN>/<year>/<date>-<id>_zip.zip), ESEF packages as published by each issuer, converted the same way (scripts/esef-cmvm/collect_hanfa.py). HANFA states that every user may reuse its information for commercial or non-commercial purposes under the Croatian Right to Access Information Act
• Hungary: MNB Közzétételek (https://kozzetetelek.mnb.hu/search/advanced, HTML form; view …/kozzetetelek?viewid=K<n>/<year>; file …/downloadkozzetetel?id=<n>&did=K<n>/<year>), ESEF packages as published by each issuer, converted the same way (scripts/esef-cmvm/collect_mnb.py)
• Lithuania: oam.lt, the Lithuanian OAM run by Nasdaq Vilnius (https://oam.lt/, HTML form POST, category 171 = annual financial report; message /view/<messageId>; file /cns-web/oam/viewAttachment.action?messageAttachmentId=<N>), ESEF packages as published by each issuer, converted the same way (scripts/esef-cmvm/collect_oamlt.py)

Quick Start

Add to your MCP client (Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, etc.):

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "esef-filings": {
      "url": "https://gateway.pipeworx.io/esef-filings/mcp"
    }
  }
}

What this endpoint actually serves

tools/list at https://gateway.pipeworx.io/esef-filings/mcp returns the tools in the table above plus the shared Pipeworx meta-tools — ask_pipeworx, discover_tools, search_within, remember/recall and the rest of the gateway-wide set. So the tool count you see is larger than this table: a single-pack endpoint currently lists roughly 30 shared tools alongside the pack's own. The connection's initialize response states its exact scope, and is the authoritative answer for a given day.

This is deliberate, not multiplexing by accident. The meta-tools are what let a scoped connection answer a question this pack does not cover — via ask_pipeworx, which routes across the whole catalog — without you adding a second MCP server. There is currently no way to mount a pack endpoint without them; if the extra schemas cost you more context than the routing is worth, connect to the full gateway once rather than to several pack endpoints.

Or connect to the full Pipeworx gateway to get every pack's tools listed directly, instead of just this one's:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "pipeworx": {
      "url": "https://gateway.pipeworx.io/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Both URLs reach the same gateway and the same 1684+ data sources. The only difference is which pack's tools are listed directly; ask_pipeworx reaches all of them from either one.

No MCP client? Call it over HTTP

curl -X POST https://gateway.pipeworx.io/v1/tools/esef_search_filings \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{"entity_name":"Citycon","country":"FI"}'

No account needed for the first calls. Inspect any tool: GET https://gateway.pipeworx.io/v1/tools/esef_search_filings. Find one: POST https://gateway.pipeworx.io/v1/tools/search_packs with {"query":"..."}.

Standalone (no gateway account)

This package also runs as a local stdio MCP server — no Pipeworx account, no gateway round-trip:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "esef-filings": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["-y", "@pipeworx/mcp-esef-filings"]
    }
  }
}

Or run it directly to confirm it starts:

npx -y @pipeworx/mcp-esef-filings

It speaks MCP over stdin/stdout and answers initialize/tools/list/tools/call for only this pack's tools — none of the shared meta-tools the gateway connection above adds. Same source, same tools, no ask_pipeworx routing.

Using with ask_pipeworx

Instead of calling tools directly, you can ask questions in plain English — this works on the pack endpoint above as well as on the full gateway:

ask_pipeworx({ question: "your question about Esef Filings data" })

The gateway picks the right tool and fills the arguments automatically.

More

• Docs and guides
• pipeworx.io

License

MIT