npm package discovery and stats viewer.

Discover Tips

  • General search

    [free text search, go nuts!]

  • Package details

    pkg:[package-name]

  • User packages

    @[username]

Sponsor

Optimize Toolset

I’ve always been into building performant and accessible sites, but lately I’ve been taking it extremely seriously. So much so that I’ve been building a tool to help me optimize and monitor the sites that I build to make sure that I’m making an attempt to offer the best experience to those who visit them. If you’re into performant, accessible and SEO friendly sites, you might like it too! You can check it out at Optimize Toolset.

About

Hi, 👋, I’m Ryan Hefner  and I built this site for me, and you! The goal of this site was to provide an easy way for me to check the stats on my npm packages, both for prioritizing issues and updates, and to give me a little kick in the pants to keep up on stuff.

As I was building it, I realized that I was actually using the tool to build the tool, and figured I might as well put this out there and hopefully others will find it to be a fast and useful way to search and browse npm packages as I have.

If you’re interested in other things I’m working on, follow me on Twitter or check out the open source projects I’ve been publishing on GitHub.

I am also working on a Twitter bot for this site to tweet the most popular, newest, random packages from npm. Please follow that account now and it will start sending out packages soon–ish.

Open Software & Tools

This site wouldn’t be possible without the immense generosity and tireless efforts from the people who make contributions to the world and share their work via open source initiatives. Thank you 🙏

© 2024 – Pkg Stats / Ryan Hefner

fauton

v0.0.9

Published

A library to test any finite automaton with arbitrary alphabets

Downloads

22

Readme

Please note that I won't be following semver at the initial stages, as there could be a lot of (breaking) changes between each release which will all be patch

Features

  1. Test any valid dfa/nfa/ε-nfa/regex
  2. Supports arbitrary alphabets
  3. Easy to use api to generate input strings
  4. ε-nfa to nfa conversion
  5. ε-nfa/nfa to dfa conversion
  6. Generate artifacts files for each automaton
  7. Highly customizable
  8. Full typescript support
  9. Simple concise error messages for invalid finite automaton
  10. Generate full graph for ε-nfa given a string
  11. Generate ε closure of a single state

Motivation

Its easy to check whether a string should be accepted or rejected using our favourite programming languages, but its a lot harder to transfer the logic to a finite automaton. Even if we are quite sure we can't be 100% sure until and unless we try out all the possible combinations of alphabet of the automata. This is an extremely tedious and error-prone process. Why not automate testing an automaton?

Examples

Dfa for string that starts with bc

Lets start out with a simple dfa, that checks whether an input string starts with bc. The alphabets of the dfa are a, b, c

A dfa that checks if a input string starts with bc

// import the class from the library
const { DeterministicFiniteAutomaton, FiniteAutomataTest } = require('fauton');
const startsWithBC = new DeterministicFiniteAutomaton(
	// Callback that will be passed each of the input string to test whether its should be accepted by the dfa or not
	(inputString) => inputString.startsWith('bc'),
	{
		// Required: The alphabets dfa accepts
		alphabets: ['a', 'b', 'c'],
		// Optional: A description of what the dfa does
		description: 'Starts with bc',
		// Required: An array of final states of the dfa
		final_states: ['Q3'],
		// Required: Label of the dfa. Convention is to use snake_case words
		label: 'starts_with_bc',
		// Required: Start state of the dfa
		start_state: 'Q0',
		// Required: An array of states the dfa accepts
		states: ['Q0', 'Q1', 'Q2', 'Q3'],
		// Required: A object of transition
		// Each key represents the state
		// The value is an array of strings, which should be equal to the length of the alphabets
		// Here if we are in state 'Q1' and we encounter symbol 'a', we move to the state 'Q2'
		transitions: {
			Q0: ['Q2', 'Q1', 'Q2'],
			Q1: ['Q2', 'Q2', 'Q3'],
			// this 'loop' is the same as ['Q2', 'Q2', 'Q2']
			// For automaton with bigger alphabets it might be difficult to write that out so its added as a convenience
			Q2: 'loop',
			Q3: 'loop',
		},
	}
);

// The constructor takes only one argument, the directory where the all the artifact files will be generated, if its not present, it will be created
const finiteAutomataTest = new FiniteAutomataTest(path.join(__dirname, 'logs'));

// Call the test method to test out the automaton
// We will learn more about the array thats being passed later
finiteAutomataTest.test([
	{
		// The automaton to test
		automaton: startsWithBC,
		// A configuration object that is used to feed input strings to the automaton
		options: {
			type: 'generate',
			combo: {
				maxLength: 10,
			},
		},
	},
]);

Binary string divisible by 2 or 3 but not both

In this case it will be better if we construct two dfa's and merge them together to form the final dfa.

Let D2 be the dfa responsible for checking divisibility by 2 and D3 be responsible for divisibility by 3

Our condition is (D2 OR D3) AND NOT(D2 AND D3), meaning either the string passes through D2 or D3, but not by both. So 2 will be accepted, 3 will be accepted but 6 will be rejected as its divisible by both 2 and 3

A dfa that checks if a binary string is divisible by 2 or 3 but not both

Lets generate a new dfa by combining the first two dfa's !!!

const { FiniteAutomataTest, DeterministicFiniteAutomaton } = require('fauton');
const path = require('path');

const DivisibleBy3 = new DeterministicFiniteAutomaton(
	(inputString) => parseInt(inputString, 2) % 3 === 0,
	{
		alphabets: ['0', '1'],
		final_states: ['A'],
		label: 'divisible_by_3',
		start_state: 'A',
		states: ['A', 'B', 'C'],
		transitions: {
			A: ['A', 'B'],
			B: ['C', 'A'],
			C: ['B', 'C'],
		},
		description: 'Dfa to accept strings divisible by 3',
	}
);

const DivisibleBy2 = new DeterministicFiniteAutomaton(
	(inputString) => parseInt(inputString, 2) % 2 === 0,
	{
		alphabets: ['0', '1'],
		final_states: ['X'],
		label: 'divisible_by_2',
		start_state: 'X',
		states: ['X', 'Y'],
		transitions: {
			X: ['X', 'Y'],
			Y: ['X', 'Y'],
		},
		description: 'Dfa to accept strings divisible by 2',
	}
);

const DivisibleBy2Or3 = DivisibleBy2.OR(DivisibleBy3);
const NotDivisibleBy2And3 = DivisibleBy2.AND(DivisibleBy3).NOT();

const DivisibleBy3Or2ButNotByBoth = DivisibleBy2Or3.AND(NotDivisibleBy2And3);

const finiteAutomataTest = new FiniteAutomataTest(path.resolve(__dirname, 'logs'));
finiteAutomataTest.test([
	{
		automaton: DivisibleBy3Or2ButNotByBoth,
		options: {
			type: 'generate',
			combo: {
				maxLength: 10,
			},
		},
	},
]);

// Merged transitions
console.log(DivisibleBy3Or2ButNotByBoth.automaton.transitions);
// Merged start state
console.log(DivisibleBy3Or2ButNotByBoth.automaton.start_state);
// Merged final states
console.log(DivisibleBy3Or2ButNotByBoth.automaton.final_states);
> {
  'X.A': { '0': [ 'X.A' ], '1': [ 'Y.B' ] },
  'Y.A': { '0': [ 'X.A' ], '1': [ 'Y.B' ] },
  'X.B': { '0': [ 'X.C' ], '1': [ 'Y.A' ] },
  'Y.B': { '0': [ 'X.C' ], '1': [ 'Y.A' ] },
  'X.C': { '0': [ 'X.B' ], '1': [ 'Y.C' ] },
  'Y.C': { '0': [ 'X.B' ], '1': [ 'Y.C' ] }
}
> X.A
> [ 'Y.A', 'X.B', 'X.C' ]

It automatically generates the merged transitions, new start and final states

Nfa for string that starts with ab

nfa for string that starts with ab

const { NonDeterministicFiniteAutomaton, FiniteAutomataTest } = require('fauton');
const path = require('path');

const startsWithAB = new NonDeterministicFiniteAutomaton(
	(inputString) => inputString.startsWith('ab'),
	{
		alphabets: ['a', 'b', 'c'],
		description: 'Starts with ab',
		final_states: ['C'],
		label: 'starts_with_ab',
		start_state: 'A',
		states: ['A', 'B', 'C'],
		transitions: {
			A: ['B'],
			B: [null, 'C'],
			C: 'loop',
		},
	}
);

const finiteAutomataTest = new FiniteAutomataTest(path.join(__dirname, 'logs'));
finiteAutomataTest.test([
	{
		automaton: startsWithAB,
		options: {
			type: 'generate',
			combo: {
				maxLength: 10,
			},
		},
	},
]);

ε-nfa to nfa

Lets say we have the following ε-nfa, and we want to convert it to nfa

epsilon nfa to regular nfa

const { NonDeterministicFiniteAutomaton } = require('fauton');
const path = require('path');

const randomEpsilonNFA = new NonDeterministicFiniteAutomaton(
	(inputString) => inputString.startsWith('ab'),
	{
		alphabets: ['a', 'b', 'c'],
		description: 'Starts with ab',
		final_states: ['C'],
		label: 'random_epsilon_nfa',
		start_state: 'A',
		states: ['A', 'B', 'C'],
		transitions: {
			A: ['B', null, 'B'],
			B: [null, 'C'],
			C: [null, null, 'C'],
		},
		epsilon_transitions: {
			A: ['B'],
		},
	}
);

// Epsilon-nfa is automatically converted to regular nfa
console.log(randomEpsilonNFA.automaton.transitions);
{
  A: { a: [ 'B', 'C' ], c: [ 'B', 'C' ], b: [ 'C' ] },
  B: { b: [ 'C' ], a: [], c: [ 'C' ] },
  C: { c: [ 'C' ] }
}

Generate and render full graph for a ε-nfa given a string

const { NonDeterministicFiniteAutomaton, Render } = require('fauton');
const path = require('path');

const randomEpsilonNFA = new NonDeterministicFiniteAutomaton(
	(inputString) => inputString.startsWith('ab'),
	{
		alphabets: ['a', 'b', 'c'],
		description: 'Starts with ab',
		final_states: ['C'],
		label: 'random_epsilon_nfa',
		start_state: 'A',
		states: ['A', 'B', 'C'],
		transitions: {
			A: ['B', 'C', 'B'],
			B: ['A', 'C'],
			C: ['A', null, 'C'],
		},
		epsilon_transitions: {
			A: ['B'],
			B: ['C'],
		},
	}
);

const { graph } = randomEpsilonNFA.generateGraphFromString('abbc');
console.log(JSON.stringify(graph, null, 2));
Render.graphToHtml(graph, path.join(__dirname, 'index.html'));
{
  "name": "A",
  "state": "A",
  "string": "",
  "depth": 0,
  "symbol": null,
  "children": [
    {
      "name": "B(a)",
      "state": "B",
      "string": "a",
      "depth": 1,
      "symbol": "a",
      "children": [
        {
          "name": "C(b)",
          "state": "C",
          "string": "ab",
          "depth": 2,
          "symbol": "b",
          "children": []
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "name": "C(a)",
      "state": "C",
      "string": "a",
      "depth": 1,
      "symbol": "a",
      "children": []
    },
    {
      "name": "A(a)",
      "state": "A",
      "string": "a",
      "depth": 1,
      "symbol": "a",
      "children": [
        {
          "name": "C(b)",
          "state": "C",
          "string": "ab",
          "depth": 2,
          "symbol": "b",
          "children": []
        }
      ]
    }
  ]
}

Generated d3 graph

Conversion from ε-nfa to dfa

const { NonDeterministicFiniteAutomaton } = require('fauton');

const epsilonNfa = new NonDeterministicFiniteAutomaton((_, automatonTest) => automatonTest, {
	start_state: 0,
	alphabets: ['a', 'b'],
	final_states: [10],
	label: 'sample ε nfa',
	states: [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10],
	transitions: {
		2: [3],
		4: [null, 5],
		7: [8],
		8: [null, 9],
		9: [null, 10],
	},
	epsilon_transitions: {
		0: [1, 7],
		1: [2, 4],
		3: [6],
		5: [6],
		6: [1, 7],
	},
});

console.log(JSON.stringify(epsilonNfa.convertToDeterministicFiniteAutomaton(), null, 2));
{
	"automaton": {
		"alphabets": ["a", "b"],
		"final_states": ["0,1,10,2,4,5,6,7"],
		"label": "sample ε nfa",
		"start_state": "0,1,2,4,7",
		"states": ["0,1,2,4,7", "1,2,3,4,6,7,8", "1,2,4,5,6,7", "1,2,4,5,6,7,9", "0,1,10,2,4,5,6,7"],
		"transitions": {
			"0,1,2,4,7": {
				"a": ["1,2,3,4,6,7,8"],
				"b": ["1,2,4,5,6,7"]
			},
			"1,2,3,4,6,7,8": {
				"a": ["1,2,3,4,6,7,8"],
				"b": ["1,2,4,5,6,7,9"]
			},
			"1,2,4,5,6,7": {
				"a": ["1,2,3,4,6,7,8"],
				"b": ["1,2,4,5,6,7"]
			},
			"1,2,4,5,6,7,9": {
				"a": ["1,2,3,4,6,7,8"],
				"b": ["0,1,10,2,4,5,6,7"]
			},
			"0,1,10,2,4,5,6,7": {
				"a": ["1,2,3,4,6,7,8"],
				"b": ["1,2,4,5,6,7"]
			}
		},
		"epsilon_transitions": null
	}
}

Conversion from nfa to dfa

const { NonDeterministicFiniteAutomaton } = require('fauton');

const nfa = new NonDeterministicFiniteAutomaton((_, automatonTest) => automatonTest, {
	start_state: 'q0',
	alphabets: ['a', 'b'],
	final_states: ['q1'],
	label: 'sample nfa',
	states: ['q0', 'q1', 'q2'],
	transitions: {
		q0: [['q2', 'q1']],
		q2: [['q2', 'q1'], 'q2'],
	},
});

console.log(JSON.stringify(nfa.convertToDeterministicFiniteAutomaton(), null, 2));
{
	"automaton": {
		"alphabets": ["a", "b"],
		"final_states": ["q1,q2"],
		"label": "sample nfa",
		"start_state": "q0",
		"states": ["q0", "q1,q2", "Ø", "q2"],
		"transitions": {
			"q0": {
				"a": ["q1,q2"],
				"b": ["Ø"]
			},
			"q1,q2": {
				"a": ["q1,q2"],
				"b": ["q2"]
			},
			"q2": {
				"a": ["q1,q2"],
				"b": ["q2"]
			},
			"Ø": {
				"a": ["Ø"],
				"b": ["Ø"]
			}
		},
		"epsilon_transitions": null
	}
}

Dfa minimization

const { DeterministicFiniteAutomaton } = require('fauton');

const dfa = new DeterministicFiniteAutomaton(() => true, {
	states: [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7],
	alphabets: ['0', '1'],
	final_states: [2],
	start_state: 0,
	label: 'dfa',
	transitions: {
		0: [1, 5],
		1: [6, 2],
		2: [0, 2],
		3: [2, 6],
		4: [7, 5],
		5: [2, 6],
		6: [6, 4],
		7: [6, 2],
	},
});

console.log(dfa.minimize().automaton);
{
	"label": "dfa",
	"alphabets": ["0", "1"],
	"final_states": ["2"],
	"start_state": "04",
	"states": ["04", "35", "17", "6", "2"],
	"transitions": {
		"2": {
			"0": ["04"],
			"1": ["2"]
		},
		"6": {
			"0": ["6"],
			"1": ["04"]
		},
		"17": {
			"0": ["6"],
			"1": ["2"]
		},
		"35": {
			"0": ["2"],
			"1": ["6"]
		},
		"04": {
			"0": ["17"],
			"1": ["35"]
		}
	},
	"epsilon_transitions": null
}

Dfa equivalency by testing

Testing if two dfa are equal through testing. One of the dfa is the minimized version of the other dfa, all the input string should return similar test result for both of them.

import { DeterministicFiniteAutomaton, FiniteAutomataTest, FiniteAutomatonUtils } from 'fauton';
import path from 'path';

const dfa = new DeterministicFiniteAutomaton(() => true, {
	states: [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7],
	alphabets: ['0', '1'],
	final_states: [2],
	start_state: 0,
	label: 'dfa',
	transitions: {
		0: [1, 5],
		1: [6, 2],
		2: [0, 2],
		3: [2, 6],
		4: [7, 5],
		5: [2, 6],
		6: [6, 4],
		7: [6, 2],
	},
});

const minimized_dfa = dfa.minimize();

minimized_dfa.testLogic = (inputString) => {
	return FiniteAutomatonUtils.generateGraphFromString(dfa.automaton, inputString)
		.automatonTestResult;
};

const finiteAutomataTest = new FiniteAutomataTest(path.join(__dirname, 'logs'));

finiteAutomataTest.test([
	{
		automaton: minimized_dfa,
		options: {
			type: 'generate',
			combo: {
				maxLength: 10,
			},
		},
	},
]);

Testing regular expressions

Rather than testing only a finite automaton, you can also test your regular expressions against generated strings

import { FiniteAutomataTest, RegularExpression } from 'fauton';
import path from 'path';

const regex = new RegularExpression(
	(inputString) => {
		return (
			inputString[0] === 'a' &&
			inputString[1] === 'b' &&
			inputString
				.slice(2)
				.split('')
				.every((char) => char === 'c')
		);
	},
	{
		alphabets: ['a', 'b', 'c'],
		label: 'Starts with a and b, ends with any number of c',
		regex: /^abc*$/g,
	}
);

const finiteAutomataTest = new FiniteAutomataTest(path.join(__dirname, 'logs'));

finiteAutomataTest.test([
	{
		automaton: regex,
		options: {
			type: 'generate',
			combo: {
				maxLength: 10,
			},
		},
	},
]);

Take a look at examples folder for more examples.

Conditions for DFA

Deterministic finite automaton must follow certain conditions for it to be considered as one. These are described below

  1. transitions record must contain all the elements of states array as its key
  2. Only the items of the states can be the key of the transitions record
  3. transitions record values must either be an array or the string literal loop
  4. If its an array its length should be the same alphabets array, where each index represents which state to transition to when encountering a symbol (index of the alphabets array)
  5. Also if its an array each item should be a string as for a single symbol a dfa can transition to only one state
  6. transitions record values can only have symbols that are present in the alphabets array

Transitions Record Transformation

dfa

All the states of the dfa must have transitions for all the input symbols.

{
	"final_states": ["A", "B", "C"],
	"alphabets": ["0", "1", "2"],
	"transitions": {
		"A": ["B", "C", "A"],
		"B": ["C", "A", "C"],
		"C": "loop"
	}
}

For the above automaton, the transitions record will be transformed like the following:-

{
	"A": {
		"0": "B",
		"1": "C",
		"2": "A",
	},
	"B": {
		"0": "C",
		"1": "A",
		"2": "C",
	},
	"C": {
		"0": "C",
		"1": "C",
		"2": "C",
	},
};

nfa

{
	"alphabets": ["a", "b", "c"],
	"states": ["A", "B", "C"],
	"transitions": {
		"A": ["B", null, "B"],
		"B": [null, "C"],
		"C": [null, null, "C"]
	}
}

Since its a nfa the conditions of transitions record for dfa is not applicable here

{
  "A": {
    "a": ["B"],
    "c": ["B"]
  },
  "B": {
    "b": ["C"]
  },
  "C": {
    "c": ["C"]
  }
}

ε-nfa

{
	"alphabets": ["a", "b", "c"],
	"states": ["A", "B", "C"],
	"transitions": {
		"A": ["B", null, "B"],
		"B": [null, "C"],
		"C": [null, null, "C"]
	},
	"epsilon_transitions": {
		"A": ["B"]
	}
}

Transformed transitions record

{
  A: { a: [ 'B', 'C' ], c: [ 'B', 'C' ], b: [ 'C' ] },
  B: { b: [ 'C' ], a: [], c: [ 'C' ] },
  C: { c: [ 'C' ] }
}

Input string generation

When testing the finite automaton using the FiniteAutomataTest class object's test method there are four ways to provide input strings to the automaton and the logic test callback

Reading from a file

If you already have a file that contains a bunch of input strings made of valid symbols of the automata you can load that file and feed each strings (delimited by a newline) to the automata and logic test.

finiteAutomataTest.test([
	{
		automaton,
		options: {
			type: 'file',
			// Path to the input file
			filePath: path.join(__dirname, 'input.txt'),
		},
	},
]);

Custom array of strings

You can provide your own custom array of strings to feed to the automaton and logic test callback.

finiteAutomataTest.test([
	{
		automaton,
		options: {
			type: 'custom',
			inputs: ['101', '110', '00101'],
		},
	},
]);

Generating random strings

You can feed automaton and logic test callback a set of unique randomly generated strings from the alphabet of the automaton

finiteAutomataTest.test([
	{
		automaton,
		options: {
			type: 'generate',
			random: {
				// Maximum length of the random string
				maxLength: 4,
				// Minimum length of the random string
				minLength: 2,
				// Total unique random strings
				total: 5,
			},
		},
	},
]);

Generating all combinations of certain length

You can feed automata and logic test callback a set of unique randomly generated strings from the alphabet of the automata

finiteAutomataTest.test([
	{
		automaton,
		options: {
			type: 'generate',
			combo: {
				maxLength: 3,
			},
		},
	},
]);

If you alphabet is a,b then it will generate the following set of strings

a, b, aa, bb, ab, ba, aaa, aab, aba, abb, bbb, bba, bab, baa

Generated artifact files

After running the test, artifact files will be generated in the folder specified in the FiniteAutomataTest class constructor. These files contain additional information about the test and starts with the label of the dfa.

Sample artifact files

Sample artifact files shown inside logs directory

Post dfa test file structure

<fa.label>.accepted.txt

Contains all the strings that will be accepted by the automaton

Sample accepted artifact file

<fa.label>.aggregate.txt

Contains an aggregated result of the test. Its similar to what is shown in the terminal. See Terminal Output

Sample aggregate artifact file

<fa.label>.case.txt

Contains detailed results for each input string test case.

Sample case artifact file

  • Result: CORRECT if fa.result == logic.result, WRONG otherwise
  • String: Input string
  • Logic: logic.result
  • FA: fa.result

<fa.label>.correct.txt

Contains all the strings that generated the same boolean result from the logic test callback and the automaton.

Sample correct artifact file

  • First column: fa.result
  • Second column: logic.result
  • Third column: Input string

<fa.label>.incorrect.txt

Contains all the strings that generated different boolean result from the logic test callback and the automaton

Same as <fa.label>.correct.txt

<fa.label>.input.txt

Contains all the input strings. Useful when you are generating random or combo strings and want to reuse it for later

Same as <fa.label>.accepted.txt

<fa.label>.rejected.txt

Contains all the strings that have been rejected by the automaton

Same as <fa.label>.accepted.txt

Terminal Output

While the test is proceeding the progress will be shown in the terminal, and once its done an aggregated result of the test will be shown as below.

Sample terminal output

Post dfa test terminal

  • fa.result: Indicates the result from the finite automata
  • logic.result: Indicates the result from the logic test

The progress bar shows the number of input strings that's been processed. Beneath that the label, description and the total number of input strings are shown

Incorrect Portion

  • Incorrect: Total number of strings where the automaton and logic test gave different result. Conditions:-
    • fa.result = false && logic.result = true
    • fa.result = true && logic.result = false
  • Incorrect(%): Percentage of strings that are incorrect out of all strings
  • False Positives: Total number of strings that didn't pass the logic test but passed the automata test. Condition:-
    • fa.result = true && logic.result = false
  • False Positives(%): Total number of false positives out of all strings
  • False Negatives: Total number of strings that passed the logic test but didn't pass the automata test. Condition:-
    • fa.result = false && logic.result = true
  • False Negatives(%): Total number of false negatives out of all strings

Correct Portion

  • Correct: Total number of strings where the automaton and logic test gave same result. Conditions:-
    • fa.result = true && logic.result = true
    • fa.result = false && logic.result = false
  • Correct(%): Percentage of strings that are correct out of all strings
  • True Positives: Total number of strings that passed both the logic and automata test. Condition:-
    • fa.result = true && logic.result = true
  • True Positives(%): Total number of true positives out of all strings
  • True Negatives: Total number of strings that didn't pass both the logic and automata test. Condition:-
    • fa.result = false && logic.result = false
  • True Negatives(%): Total number of true negatives out of all strings

Better and more detailed api documentation coming soon very soon !!!

Contributors

  1. Safwan Shaheer github Author, Maintainer

Algorithm Sources

Wikipedia sources for all the algorithms used in the package

  1. Thompson-McNaughton-Yamada algorithm for converting regex to e-nfa
  2. Hopcroft algorithm for dfa-minimization
  3. Rabin–Scott powerset construction algorithm to convert nfa to dfa
  4. Shunting-Yard algorithm to convert regex string from infix to postfix

Credits

Big thanks to all these wonderful repos.

  1. Orban Regular expression engine that uses the Thompson-McNaughton-Yamada algorithm implemented in Python.

Feel free to submit a pull request or open a new issue, contributions are more than welcome !!!