npm package discovery and stats viewer.

Discover Tips

  • General search

    [free text search, go nuts!]

  • Package details

    pkg:[package-name]

  • User packages

    @[username]

Sponsor

Optimize Toolset

I’ve always been into building performant and accessible sites, but lately I’ve been taking it extremely seriously. So much so that I’ve been building a tool to help me optimize and monitor the sites that I build to make sure that I’m making an attempt to offer the best experience to those who visit them. If you’re into performant, accessible and SEO friendly sites, you might like it too! You can check it out at Optimize Toolset.

About

Hi, 👋, I’m Ryan Hefner  and I built this site for me, and you! The goal of this site was to provide an easy way for me to check the stats on my npm packages, both for prioritizing issues and updates, and to give me a little kick in the pants to keep up on stuff.

As I was building it, I realized that I was actually using the tool to build the tool, and figured I might as well put this out there and hopefully others will find it to be a fast and useful way to search and browse npm packages as I have.

If you’re interested in other things I’m working on, follow me on Twitter or check out the open source projects I’ve been publishing on GitHub.

I am also working on a Twitter bot for this site to tweet the most popular, newest, random packages from npm. Please follow that account now and it will start sending out packages soon–ish.

Open Software & Tools

This site wouldn’t be possible without the immense generosity and tireless efforts from the people who make contributions to the world and share their work via open source initiatives. Thank you 🙏

© 2025 – Pkg Stats / Ryan Hefner

lego-moe-experimental

v0.1.0

Published

Experimental SDK demonstrating modular AI architecture with inverse scaling properties

Readme

LEGO-MoE Experimental SDK

⚠️ Status: Research prototype demonstrating architectural regime

Version: 0.1.0
License: MIT
Use at your own risk


What This Is

A reference implementation of modular AI architecture demonstrating:

  • 60× latency reduction via deterministic caching
  • Edge-deployable inference (no GPU)
  • Integrity-first gating

What This Is NOT

  • ❌ Production-ready AI system
  • ❌ Calibrated confidence scores (H2 gap: r=0.005)
  • ❌ Sub-millisecond cache (H5 gap: 1.74ms)

Validation Results

Based on 1,000-query validation (100,000 total runs):

  • Average latency: 3.30ms (vs 200.79ms baseline) — 60.8× faster
  • Median latency: 0.09ms — 2,226× faster
  • Cache hit rate: 87.2%

See docs/VALIDATION.md for full results.


Installation

npm install lego-moe-experimental

Quick Start

import { LegoMoE } from 'lego-moe-experimental';

const moe = new LegoMoE();

// Basic query
const result = await moe.query("What is 2+2?");
console.log(result);
// { answer: "4", latency: 0.09, cached: false }

// Repeated query (cached)
const result2 = await moe.query("What is 2+2?");
console.log(result2);
// { answer: "4", latency: 0.01, cached: true }

Features

✅ Deterministic Caching

Same input → same output, enabling safe caching:

const result1 = await moe.query("Hello");
const result2 = await moe.query("Hello");
// result1.answer === result2.answer (guaranteed)

✅ Integrity-First Gating

Invalid input rejected before expensive processing:

const result = await moe.query("!!!!");
console.log(result);
// { answer: "[REFUSED] Invalid input format", refused: true }

✅ Metrics Collection

Track latency and cache performance:

await moe.query("Query 1", { metrics: true });
await moe.query("Query 2", { metrics: true });

const metrics = moe.getMetrics();
console.log(metrics);
// {
//   totalQueries: 2,
//   avgLatency: 1.5,
//   cacheHitRate: 0.5,
//   ...
// }

Configuration

const moe = new LegoMoE({
  cache: {
    enabled: true,
    maxSize: 10000,
    ttl: 3600000  // 1 hour
  },
  gatekeeper: {
    enabled: true,
    refusalThreshold: 0.95
  },
  metrics: {
    collectLatency: true,
    collectExpertUsage: true
  }
});

Known Gaps

⚠️ IMPORTANT: See docs/KNOWN_GAPS.md for:

  • H2: Confidence correlation (r=0.005, target >0.7) — fix in progress
  • H5: Cache latency (1.74ms, target <1ms) — optimization in progress
  • H3: Determinism validation (pending rerun)

Do NOT use confidence scores for safety-critical decisions.


Examples

See examples/ directory:


Documentation


Use Cases

✅ Good for:

  • Research and prototyping
  • Architectural exploration
  • Latency benchmarking
  • Edge deployment testing

❌ NOT good for:

  • Production systems
  • Safety-critical applications
  • Calibrated confidence requirements

Contributing

This is a research prototype. Contributions welcome, but understand:

  • Architecture is experimental
  • Breaking changes expected
  • No production support

License

MIT License — use at your own risk


Citation

If you use this in research, please cite:

@misc{bhosale2025inverse,
  title={Verified Architectural Regime: Computation Cost Decreases with Effective Certainty},
  author={Bhosale, Shrikant},
  year={2025},
  note={Technical Report v1.0}
}

The SDK demonstrates what's real. The gaps show what's honest.