npm package discovery and stats viewer.

Discover Tips

  • General search

    [free text search, go nuts!]

  • Package details

    pkg:[package-name]

  • User packages

    @[username]

Sponsor

Optimize Toolset

I’ve always been into building performant and accessible sites, but lately I’ve been taking it extremely seriously. So much so that I’ve been building a tool to help me optimize and monitor the sites that I build to make sure that I’m making an attempt to offer the best experience to those who visit them. If you’re into performant, accessible and SEO friendly sites, you might like it too! You can check it out at Optimize Toolset.

About

Hi, 👋, I’m Ryan Hefner  and I built this site for me, and you! The goal of this site was to provide an easy way for me to check the stats on my npm packages, both for prioritizing issues and updates, and to give me a little kick in the pants to keep up on stuff.

As I was building it, I realized that I was actually using the tool to build the tool, and figured I might as well put this out there and hopefully others will find it to be a fast and useful way to search and browse npm packages as I have.

If you’re interested in other things I’m working on, follow me on Twitter or check out the open source projects I’ve been publishing on GitHub.

I am also working on a Twitter bot for this site to tweet the most popular, newest, random packages from npm. Please follow that account now and it will start sending out packages soon–ish.

Open Software & Tools

This site wouldn’t be possible without the immense generosity and tireless efforts from the people who make contributions to the world and share their work via open source initiatives. Thank you 🙏

© 2026 – Pkg Stats / Ryan Hefner

nosuckreadme

v0.2.1

Published

Generate a GitHub README that doesn't suck — honest badges, real install/usage, known limitations.

Readme

nosuckreadme

Generate a GitHub README that doesn't suck - honest badges, real install/usage, known limitations.

license version JavaScript node

Most small GitHub projects ship a README that's either three lines long or stuffed with decorative badges that mean nothing. nosuckreadme scans your repo and writes a real one: the install command that actually matches your ecosystem, usage pulled from your real entry points, a roadmap built from your own TODOs - and only the badges it can back with a fact. No fake "build passing". No "downloads" it can't verify. When it doesn't know something, it leaves a visible <!-- TODO --> instead of making it up.

It runs offline, needs zero config, no API key, and the output is deterministic.

demo

Table of contents

Why

A good README is what turns an abandoned repo into something people try. Writing it by hand is tedious, and existing generators often make things worse: they throw in a row of "PRs welcome / made with love" badges and an empty skeleton to fill in.

nosuckreadme starts from the opposite: only write what you can prove from the repo. The rest stays a visible hole, not a lie.

Installation

Without installing anything:

npx nosuckreadme

Or globally:

npm install -g nosuckreadme

Usage

# Preview the current repo without writing anything
npx nosuckreadme . --dry-run

# Write the result (refuses to overwrite an existing README.md)
npx nosuckreadme . -o README.md

# Force overwrite
npx nosuckreadme . -o README.md --force

| Option | Effect | |--------|--------| | [path] | Repo to scan (default: .) | | -o, --output <file> | Write to a file instead of stdout | | --stdout | Force standard output | | --force | Allow overwriting an existing README.md | | --dry-run | Show a preview, write nothing | | --explain | Show the justification for each badge and section | | --name <name> | Force the project name | | --description <text> | Force the description |

Safety: without --force, nosuckreadme will never overwrite an existing README.md - it writes next to it as README.generated.md and exits with code 2.

Before / After

Before — a typical small-project README:

# my-tool
my tool

![build](https://img.shields.io/badge/build-passing-brightgreen)  ← no CI in the repo
![PRs](https://img.shields.io/badge/PRs-welcome-blue)             ← decorative

After — what nosuckreadme generates instead:

# my-tool

A real one-line description, pulled from your manifest.

![license](https://img.shields.io/badge/license-MIT-blue) ![JavaScript](…) ![node](https://img.shields.io/badge/node-%3E%3D18-339933)
↑ only badges backed by a fact: no CI in the repo → no build badge

## Installation

    npx my-tool

## Roadmap

<!-- TODO(nosuckreadme): add the next steps -->
↑ an honest hole to fill in, never an invented one

Every badge maps to something real in the repo (a LICENSE file, a measured language, a declared runtime). What it can't prove, it leaves as a visible stub.

How It Decides (Nothing Invented)

--explain shows, for each badge and section, the fact that justifies it:

$ npx nosuckreadme . --explain --dry-run

Badges generated:
  license              LICENSE file present and identified as MIT
  version              Version 0.1.0 declared in the manifest
  JavaScript           JavaScript is the main detected language (51185 bytes)
  node >=18            Runtime requirement >=18 declared in the manifest

No LICENSE file? No license badge. No .github/workflows/? No CI badge. That's the whole philosophy.

Recognized ecosystems: Node (package.json), Python (pyproject.toml), Rust (Cargo.toml), Go (go.mod), plus a generic fallback mode.

Roadmap

  • [ ] nosuckreadme lint: audit an existing README and list its "suck factors"
  • [ ] Optional --enhance mode (LLM) to rewrite description/usage, off by default
  • [ ] Additional detectors: Ruby, PHP, Java, Deno
  • [ ] Opt-in online verification of npm/PyPI status for exact version badges

Known Limitations

  • TODO/FIXME extraction reads text, not the AST: a // TODO: inside a string may appear in the roadmap.
  • License detection covers common SPDX licenses (MIT, Apache-2.0, GPL, BSD, ISC, MPL, AGPL...); an exotic license falls back to a stub.
  • The CI badge assumes a workflow named ci.yml and a GitHub repo.
  • Description and examples often still need manual polishing - the tool lays honest foundations, not final prose.

Contributing

PRs are welcome. Run the test suite before submitting a change:

npm test

License

Distributed under the MIT license.


Bootstrapped with itself: the first version of this README was generated by nosuckreadme, then hand-polished - exactly the intended workflow.