npm package discovery and stats viewer.

Discover Tips

  • General search

    [free text search, go nuts!]

  • Package details

    pkg:[package-name]

  • User packages

    @[username]

Sponsor

Optimize Toolset

I’ve always been into building performant and accessible sites, but lately I’ve been taking it extremely seriously. So much so that I’ve been building a tool to help me optimize and monitor the sites that I build to make sure that I’m making an attempt to offer the best experience to those who visit them. If you’re into performant, accessible and SEO friendly sites, you might like it too! You can check it out at Optimize Toolset.

About

Hi, 👋, I’m Ryan Hefner  and I built this site for me, and you! The goal of this site was to provide an easy way for me to check the stats on my npm packages, both for prioritizing issues and updates, and to give me a little kick in the pants to keep up on stuff.

As I was building it, I realized that I was actually using the tool to build the tool, and figured I might as well put this out there and hopefully others will find it to be a fast and useful way to search and browse npm packages as I have.

If you’re interested in other things I’m working on, follow me on Twitter or check out the open source projects I’ve been publishing on GitHub.

I am also working on a Twitter bot for this site to tweet the most popular, newest, random packages from npm. Please follow that account now and it will start sending out packages soon–ish.

Open Software & Tools

This site wouldn’t be possible without the immense generosity and tireless efforts from the people who make contributions to the world and share their work via open source initiatives. Thank you 🙏

© 2024 – Pkg Stats / Ryan Hefner

react-state-sequencer

v0.0.2

Published

Utility library to help you update react state in a sequence.

Downloads

13

Readme

npm build Prettier

react-state-sequencer is a utility library that will let you make updates on your local state in a order.

Internally it uses setState callback and runs each update inside callback of previous setState call. The behavior then is an escape hatch to react setState calls batching. An example:

import React from "react";
import updateState from "react-state-sequencer";

class App extends React.Component {
  state = {
    counter: 1
  };

  handleButtonClick = () => {
    updateState(
      { counter: 1 },
      { counter: 2 },
      prevState => ({ counter: prevState.counter + 1 })
    )(this);
  };

  render() {
    console.log(this.state.counter);
    return (
      <div>
        <button onClick={this.handleButtonClick}>update state</button>
        <h2>{this.state.counter}</h2>
      </div>
    );
  }
}

Result of console.log:

1 2 3

You can also pass a function that returns a Promise as an argument

The following example will print 1, 2, 3 every second:

import React from "react";
import updateState from "react-state-sequencer";

const delayBySecond = () =>
  new Promise(resolve => {
    setTimeout(() => resolve(), 1000);
  });

class App extends React.Component {
  state = {
    counter: 1
  };

  countToThree = () => {
    updateState(
      { counter: 1 },
      delayBySecond,
      { counter: 2 },
      delayBySecond,
      { counter: 3 }
    )(this);
  };

  render() {
    return (
      <div>
        <button onClick={this.countToThree}>count to three</button>
        <h2>{this.state.counter}</h2>
      </div>
    );
  }
}

Warning

Be careful when using Promises. You may run into the following error:

Warning: Can't call setState (or forceUpdate) on an unmounted component. This is a no-op, but it indicates a memory leak in your application. To fix, cancel all subscriptions and asynchronous tasks in the componentWillUnmount method.

This happens when the component gets unmounted before the Promise resolves (e.g. when a user changes the route). Some function holds a reference to a "dead" component and tries to update it. This should be avoided.

Why?

Because I love local state (Yes, that's my chance to express that I like to keep things local unless there is a clear benefit of doing the opposite). Other than that it's just an experimental idea that popped to my head after I had to first unmount a children component before changing a number of a controlled tab (if not I would get a DOM exception).