remark-sort-definitions
v3.0.0
Published
remark plugin that reorders reference-style link definitions by id at the end of a document
Downloads
93,583
Maintainers
Readme
remark-sort-definitions
This is a unified (remark) plugin that logically reorders the reference definitions at the bottom of your document depending on your sorting preference. Also plays nicely with GFM footnotes (by completely ignoring them), and comes with full unicode support.
After running this plugin, all definitions, both numeric and alphanumeric, will always be placed at the very bottom of the document.
You might also be interested in remark-reference-links, which transforms
all your inline links into reference-style links, and
remark-renumber-references, which will contiguously renumber numeric
reference-style link ids starting from [1]. For a live example of these
plugins in action, check the bottom of this very README.md file. ✨
Install
Due to the nature of the unified ecosystem, this package is ESM only and cannot be
require'd.
To install:
npm install --save-dev remark-sort-definitionsUsage
For maximum flexibility, there are several ways this plugin can be invoked.
Via API
import { read } from 'to-vfile';
import { remark } from 'remark';
import remarkSortDefinitions from 'remark-sort-definitions';
const file = await remark()
// An options object is NOT required
.use(remarkSortDefinitions, { algorithm: 'alphanumeric-first' })
.process(await read('example.md'));
console.log(String(file));Via remark-cli
remark -o --use sort-definitions README.mdVia unified configuration
In package.json:
/* … */
"remarkConfig": {
"plugins": [
"remark-sort-definitions"
/* … */
]
},
/* … */In .remarkrc.js:
module.exports = {
plugins: [
// …
['sort-definitions', { algorithm: 'numeric-first' }]
]
};In .remarkrc.mjs:
import remarkSortDefinitions from 'remark-sort-definitions';
export default {
plugins: [
// …
remarkSortDefinitions
]
};API
Detailed interface information can be found under docs/.
Options
This plugin recognizes the following options:
algorithm
Valid values: "numeric-first" | "alphanumeric-first"
Default: "alphanumeric-first"
This option determines the sorting preference used when reordering definitions.
numeric-first will put definitions with purely numeric ids first, sorted from
least (i.e. 1) to greatest, followed by any remaining definitions sorted
naturally.
alphanumeric-first will put definitions with alphanumeric ids (i.e. any id
that cannot be parsed into an integer) first, sorted naturally, followed by any
remaining definitions sorted from least (i.e. 1) to greatest.
Examples
Suppose we have the following Markdown file example.md:
# Documentation
…
[2nd-half-idiom]: https://meme-link-2
[a-link]: https://a-link
[1st-half-idiom]: https://meme-link-1
[z-link]: https://z-link
[8]: https://npm.im/remark
[1]: https://npm.im/some-package
[5]: #related
[3]: #usage
[6]: #contributing-and-support
[2]: #install
[7]: #contributorsUsing the Default Configuration
Then running the following JavaScript:
import { read } from 'to-vfile';
import { remark } from 'remark';
import remarkSortDefinitions from 'remark-sort-definitions';
const file = await remark()
.use(remarkSortDefinitions)
// Or:
//.use(remarkSortDefinitions, { algorithm: 'alphanumeric-first' })
.process(await read('example.md'));
console.log(String(file));Would output the following (assuming remark is configured for tight references):
# Documentation
…
[1st-half-idiom]: https://meme-link-1
[2nd-half-idiom]: https://meme-link-2
[a-link]: https://a-link
[z-link]: https://z-link
[1]: https://npm.im/some-package
[2]: #install
[3]: #usage
[5]: #related
[6]: #contributing-and-support
[7]: #contributors
[8]: https://npm.im/remarkNow all the definitions have been sorted. Nice!
Using algorithm
We could also sort using an algorithm that places definitions with numeric ids first. Running the follow JavaScript:
import { read } from 'to-vfile';
import { remark } from 'remark';
import remarkSortDefinitions from 'remark-sort-definitions';
const file = await remark()
.use(remarkSortDefinitions, { algorithm: 'numeric-first' })
.process(await read('example.md'));
console.log(String(file));Would output the following (assuming remark is configured for tight references):
# Documentation
…
[1]: https://npm.im/some-package
[2]: #install
[3]: #usage
[5]: #related
[6]: #contributing-and-support
[7]: #contributors
[8]: https://npm.im/remark
[1st-half-idiom]: https://meme-link-1
[2nd-half-idiom]: https://meme-link-2
[a-link]: https://a-link
[z-link]: https://z-linkFinally, notice how those numeric reference definition ids are not contiguous: a
definition with id [4] is missing, throwing off the [1] through [8]
numbering. Luckily, there exists a remark plugin that will ensure numeric
reference ids flow through the document in ascending order starting from [1].
Related
- remark-reference-links — transform inline links into reference-style links.
- remark-remove-unused-definitions — remove unused reference definitions.
- remark-renumber-references — contiguously renumber numeric
reference-style link ids starting from
[1].
Appendix
Further documentation can be found under docs/.
Published Package Details
This is an ESM-only package built by Babel for use in Node.js
versions that are not end-of-life. For TypeScript users, this package supports
both "Node10" and "Node16" module resolution strategies.
That means ESM source will load this package via import { ... } from ... or
await import(...) and CJS source will load this package via dynamic
import(). This has several benefits, the foremost being: less code
shipped/smaller package size, avoiding dual package
hazard entirely, distributables are not
packed/bundled/uglified, and a drastically less complex build process.
The glaring downside, which may or may not be relevant, is that CJS consumers
cannot require() this package and can only use import() in an asynchronous
context. This means, in effect, CJS consumers may not be able to use this
package at all.
Each entry point (i.e. ENTRY) in package.json's
exports[ENTRY] object includes one or more export
conditions. These entries may or may not include: an
exports[ENTRY].types condition pointing to a type
declaration file for TypeScript and IDEs, a
exports[ENTRY].module condition pointing to
(usually ESM) source for Webpack/Rollup, a exports[ENTRY].node and/or
exports[ENTRY].default condition pointing to (usually CJS2) source for Node.js
require/import and for browsers and other environments, and other
conditions not enumerated here. Check the
package.json file to see which export conditions are
supported.
Note that, regardless of the { "type": "..." } specified in
package.json, any JavaScript files written in ESM
syntax (including distributables) will always have the .mjs extension. Note
also that package.json may include the
sideEffects key, which is almost always false for
optimal tree shaking where appropriate.
License
See LICENSE.
Contributing and Support
New issues and pull requests are always welcome and greatly appreciated! 🤩 Just as well, you can star 🌟 this project to let me know you found it useful! ✊🏿 Or buy me a beer, I'd appreciate it. Thank you!
See CONTRIBUTING.md and SUPPORT.md for more information.
Contributors
See the table of contributors.
