npm package discovery and stats viewer.

Discover Tips

  • General search

    [free text search, go nuts!]

  • Package details

    pkg:[package-name]

  • User packages

    @[username]

Sponsor

Optimize Toolset

I’ve always been into building performant and accessible sites, but lately I’ve been taking it extremely seriously. So much so that I’ve been building a tool to help me optimize and monitor the sites that I build to make sure that I’m making an attempt to offer the best experience to those who visit them. If you’re into performant, accessible and SEO friendly sites, you might like it too! You can check it out at Optimize Toolset.

About

Hi, 👋, I’m Ryan Hefner  and I built this site for me, and you! The goal of this site was to provide an easy way for me to check the stats on my npm packages, both for prioritizing issues and updates, and to give me a little kick in the pants to keep up on stuff.

As I was building it, I realized that I was actually using the tool to build the tool, and figured I might as well put this out there and hopefully others will find it to be a fast and useful way to search and browse npm packages as I have.

If you’re interested in other things I’m working on, follow me on Twitter or check out the open source projects I’ve been publishing on GitHub.

I am also working on a Twitter bot for this site to tweet the most popular, newest, random packages from npm. Please follow that account now and it will start sending out packages soon–ish.

Open Software & Tools

This site wouldn’t be possible without the immense generosity and tireless efforts from the people who make contributions to the world and share their work via open source initiatives. Thank you 🙏

© 2026 – Pkg Stats / Ryan Hefner

skillfire

v0.1.1

Published

The skill collision tester — does your SKILL.md win the routing race, or get cannibalized by skills people already have installed?

Readme

skillfire

npm license: MIT node >= 18

The skill collision tester. npx skillfire ./my-skill — will your SKILL.md win the routing race, or get cannibalized by the skills people already have installed?

A skill is routed by its description alone. In a saturated category (the many "commit message" skills, the many "code reviewers"), your new skill's description is a near-duplicate of a pile of existing ones — so when a user types a normal request, the agent's router sees a crowd of near-identical descriptions and may pick someone else's skill, or coin-flip. skillfire measures that collision, offline and deterministically, before you ship.

Quickstart

npx skillfire ./path/to/your-skill
COLLISION REPORT — My Commit Wizard
tested against Commit message generators · 7 skills · population 2026.06-public-v1

Distinctiveness 47/100  contested

Routing race — who the router would plausibly consider:
  ▸ "write a commit message for my staged changes"
      1 ████████████████ 1.00  caveman-commit
      2 ████████████████ 1.00  My Commit Wizard ← your skill
      3 ████████████░░░░ 0.77  conventional-commit
      4 ████████████░░░░ 0.73  git-commit-message
        contention 5 (cover ≥0.5) · dead heat 2 · margin 0.00
  ▸ "commit my changes with a good message"
      ... 6 skills tie at 0.50 ...
        contention 6 (cover ≥0.5) · dead heat 6 · margin 0.00

Near-duplicate incumbents (overlap · shared trigger terms):
  0.50  conventional-commit  shared: write, git, changes, conventional
  0.40  commit  shared: staged, following, changes, conventional

Placement: nearest twin conventional-commit (0.50) · worst tied-with 4 · cannibalized on 4/5 prompts

» Collision — your skill is cannibalized by the incumbents above. Run with --doctor to sharpen the description and win its triggers.

Collisions are real in the wild: run skillfire audit ~/.claude/skills on a populated skills folder and you'll find genuine near-duplicates (e.g. grill-me ⇄ grill-with-docs at 1.00, diagnose ⇄ diagnosing-bugs at 0.93).

Fix it — the Description-Doctor

npx skillfire ./my-skill --doctor
Description-Doctor
  before  47/100  "Write a polished git commit message from my staged changes following Conventional Commits, with an optional emoji and the related issue key."
  after   100/100  "with an optional emoji and the related issue key."
  drop generic: commit, message, changes, conventional, git
  » Leading with your distinctive wording — and dropping generic phrasing many skills share — raised distinctiveness from 47 to 100.

The suggestion is measured: every candidate is re-scored through the same engine, so the "after" number is real, not a guess. When nothing helps, it says so rather than inventing a fix.

Commands

| Command | What it does | | --- | --- | | skillfire <skill> | Collision report for a single skill against the pinned reference population | | skillfire <skill> --doctor | Suggest a sharper description with a measured before/after | | skillfire <skill> --badge | Emit a reproducible README badge (markdown + shields endpoint) | | skillfire <skill> --verify | Confirm collisions against a real Claude Code agent (stub skills) | | skillfire audit <dir> | Rank the worst near-duplicate pairs across a directory of skills | | skillfire fix-pr <skill> [--apply] | Preview (or open) a description-only fix-PR with the measured improvement |

Flags

| Flag | Effect | | --- | --- | | --against <dir> | Test against your own installed skills instead of the pinned population | | --category <key> | Force a category (commit-message, code-review, pr-description) instead of auto-detect | | --json | Machine-readable report (stable schema, no ANSI) | | --fail-under <n> | Exit non-zero when distinctiveness is below n (CI gate; default 50) |

Score badge

npx skillfire ./my-skill --badge
![skillfire](https://img.shields.io/badge/skillfire-47%2F100-yellow)

Drop the markdown into your skill's README — the score is reproducible because it's pinned to a population version.

How it works

  • Offline overlap (default, always on). Routing contention is modeled as coverage — how much of a prompt's weighted intent a description claims — and near-duplication as a weighted overlap coefficient. It's deterministic, needs no API key, and powers the score and badge.
  • Verified mode (opt-in, --verify). Installs the field as stub skills (real description, empty body), asks a real Claude Code agent each prompt, and reads the trace to see which skill actually triggered — the same report shape, confirmed against a live router.
  • Pinned reference population. A versioned set of real, sourced community skill descriptions grouped into saturated categories (sources tracked internally).

Limitations (honest)

  • The offline metric is a lexical proxy — overlap is not the same as real routing. --verify exists to confirm against a real agent (at the cost of real agent calls).
  • The pinned population is a curated public seed (v1) sourced from real skills; growing it is ongoing. For your real environment, prefer --against <your skills dir>.
  • Verified mode is validated against Claude Code 2.1.x (it reads the Skill tool_use from the stream-json trace); the trace shape may differ on other versions/agents.

Development

npm install
npm test          # vitest
npm run typecheck # tsc --noEmit
npm run build     # bundle to dist/ (tsup)
npm run skillfire -- ./examples/sample-commit-skill

Requires Node 18+ for the published CLI; the dev workflow (running TypeScript directly) needs Node 22.6+.

License

MIT