vendorshield-risk-scoring-mcp
v0.1.0
Published
MCP server for third-party vendor risk assessment — score vendors across financial, operational, cybersecurity, compliance, and concentration dimensions with automated risk tiering and mitigation recommendations
Maintainers
Readme
vendorshield-risk-scoring-mcp
MCP server for third-party vendor risk assessment. Score vendors across financial, operational, cybersecurity, compliance, and concentration dimensions with automated risk tiering and actionable mitigation recommendations.
Part of the VendorShield suite — AI-powered vendor compliance and risk management.
Installation
{
"mcpServers": {
"vendorshield-risk": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "vendorshield-risk-scoring-mcp"]
}
}
}Tools
assess_vendor_risk
Comprehensive risk assessment across 5 dimensions:
- Financial Stability (20%) — revenue trend, profitability, years in business, credit rating
- Cybersecurity Posture (25%) — SOC 2, ISO 27001, encryption, MFA, IR plan, DR plan
- Operational Resilience (20%) — SLA history, redundancy, geographic diversity, key person risk
- Regulatory Compliance (20%) — framework coverage, DPA, data residency, breach history
- Concentration Risk (15%) — spend percentage, alternatives, switching cost, data portability
Returns: overall score (0-100), risk tier, per-dimension findings, and prioritized mitigation actions.
quick_risk_score
Rapid vendor triage from minimal inputs. Provides estimated risk tier and key concerns in seconds. Use for initial screening before committing to a full assessment.
compare_vendor_risk
Side-by-side comparison of 2-5 vendors. Ranks by overall score, identifies strengths/weaknesses per vendor, supports priority dimension weighting, and calculates risk-adjusted cost efficiency.
generate_risk_report
Produces a formatted Markdown report suitable for:
- Risk committee presentations
- Audit documentation
- Stakeholder review packages
- Compliance evidence files
analyze_concentration_risk
Portfolio-level analysis across all your vendors:
- Identifies single points of failure (critical vendors with no alternatives)
- Category concentration (single-vendor categories, high spend %)
- Geographic concentration risk
- Diversification recommendations
Risk Tiers
| Score | Tier | Review Frequency | |-------|------|-----------------| | 0-20 | Critical | Monthly | | 21-40 | High | Quarterly | | 41-60 | Medium | Semi-annual | | 61-80 | Low | Annual | | 81-100 | Minimal | Biennial |
Use Cases
- Procurement teams: Score vendors during selection, compare finalists side-by-side
- Risk managers: Ongoing portfolio monitoring, concentration analysis, board reporting
- Compliance officers: Audit-ready risk documentation, framework gap analysis
- Contract renewals: Re-assess before renewal, identify leverage for negotiation
License
MIT
